Re: XhatGPT; How many physicists accept GR?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : Re: XhatGPT; How many physicists accept GR?
De : ross.a.finlayson (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Ross Finlayson)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 16. Nov 2024, 17:54:41
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <39CdnSC7U5vPU6X6nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
On 11/16/2024 05:54 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog <tomyee3@gmail.com> wrote:
>
On Sat, 16 Nov 2024 4:54:33 +0000, Sylvia Else wrote:
>
On 16-Nov-24 9:52 am, rhertz wrote:
ChatGPT entered in crisis here, after I asked HOW MANY (worldwide).
>
>
>
You realise that it's just a language model based on trawling the
Internet?
>
It's not intelligent. I doesn't know anything. It cannot reason. It just
composes sentences based on word probabilities derived from the
trawling.
>
And guess what? The Internet contains a lot of garbage; garbage that's
been fed into the language model.
>
..and an increasingly large proportion of the garbage being fed into
the large language models is garbage GENERATED by large language
models.
>
The "Mad Cow Disease" crisis of the 1980s is believed to have been due
to the practice of feeding cattle meal that contained cattle and sheep
by-products. As LLM output becomes increasingly difficult to distinguish
from human output (which is often bad enough!), I predict an outbreak of
"Mad LLM Disease".
>
Those models are trained with texts from 2022 and earlier,
with good reason,
>
Jan
>
The Google/Bing monopoly that started funded by USG projects
then morphed into a giant anarcho-capitalist tar-money-pit,
should make for a great anti-trust thrust with regards to
the many, many narratives including the common-sense,
the conventional-wisdom, and the great store of academic
output, which proper academe should reflect not re-invent.
Or, "they did not re-invent the wheel".
"A.I." has been around a long time, it's
not so hard, ..., it's so easy.
Trust-busting
Making sense of interacting with information-systems
rather requires a thorough education than being
"operationally-conditioned" to, "follow the red dot".
So, literacy tests, reading comprehension, and closed-book.
Because, that open-book is an inconstant thaumaturgist.
The Wikipedia at least seems alright, yet it
also suffers from propaganda and aggrandizement.
Herf it and start over: helps to have a library.
And academia. Of course it's established in more
civilized nations that a free public education is a right.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
16 Nov 24 * XhatGPT; How many physicists accept GR?18rhertz
16 Nov 24 +* Re: XhatGPT; How many physicists accept GR?6Ross Finlayson
16 Nov 24 i`* Re: XhatGPT; How many physicists accept GR?5rhertz
16 Nov 24 i +- Re: XhatGPT; How many physicists accept GR?1rhertz
16 Nov 24 i +- Re: XhatGPT; How many physicists accept GR?1LaurenceClarkCrossen
16 Nov 24 i `* Re: XhatGPT; How many physicists accept GR?2Ross Finlayson
16 Nov 24 i  `- Re: XhatGPT; How many physicists accept GR?1Ross Finlayson
16 Nov 24 +* Re: XhatGPT; How many physicists accept GR?8Sylvia Else
16 Nov 24 i+- Re: XhatGPT; How many physicists accept GR?1Ross Finlayson
16 Nov 24 i+- Re: XhatGPT; How many physicists accept GR?1Maciej Wozniak
16 Nov 24 i+* Re: XhatGPT; How many physicists accept GR?4ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
16 Nov 24 ii`* Re: XhatGPT; How many physicists accept GR?3J. J. Lodder
16 Nov 24 ii `* Re: XhatGPT; How many physicists accept GR?2Ross Finlayson
16 Nov 24 ii  `- Re: XhatGPT; How many physicists accept GR?1Ross Finlayson
16 Nov 24 i`- Re: XhatGPT; How many physicists accept GR?1Richard Hachel
16 Nov 24 `* Re: XhatGPT; How many physicists accept GR?3Thomas Heger
16 Nov 24  `* Re: XhatGPT; How many physicists accept GR?2Ross Finlayson
16 Nov 24   `- Re: XhatGPT; How many physicists accept GR?1Ross Finlayson

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal