Re: Relativistic aberration

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : Re: Relativistic aberration
De : hitlong (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (gharnagel)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 12. Aug 2024, 13:53:39
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <39ad13c20dc140d5dc3097e3365f7a35@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 4:33:02 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>
W dniu 11.08.2024 o 22:19, gharnagel pisze:
>
On Sun, 11 Aug 2024 18:07:25 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>
W dniu 11.08.2024 o 19:49, gharnagel pisze:
>
Clocks are human inventions, so smart humans will set
them to agree with natural phenomena.
>
Sorry, trash, they won't.
>
Denigration and prevarication aren't valid arguments.
>
Anyone can check GPS - oppositely, they will set them
to ignore natutral phenomena.
>
Wozniak asserts that "t' = t" in the GPS system, but he
>
Harrie asserts t'<>t,
Do I?  How could I without knowing what t' and t are? :-))

but when asked what t' is then - he's only spitting,
insulting and slandering.
I wasn't the one calling people "trash" -- Wozniak is
projecting again.

Let's try again: so, when t(time indicated
by a ground base clock) is 2024-08-31
17:00:00.00000000 - t' (time indicated by
a satellite clock) will be? Consider the
simultaneity of the base.
Wozniak doesn't say WHERE the measurement of the
satellite clock is made.  Of course, he wants it
to be measured at the ground, not at the satellite.
The house of cards that he's built to "disprove"
relativity fails because the GPS was engineered
to make the time of the satellite clock match the
time of the ground clock ONLY ON THE GROUND - OF
THE EARTH.  And "match" means the RATE of the
clock.  The time of the sat clock is updated from
the ground twice a day.  The time of the sat clock
is maintained between those updates by running it
at a slower rate than the ground clock according
to the dictates of relativity.  Without that
adjustment, the system would be useless most of
the time.

Lies have short legs.
They do, I guess, whatever that means.  The basic
question, though, is Wozniak basically dishonest
or is he incapable of understanding that his
thesis is a house of cards?  Is he a liar or is
he just honest but unintelligent?
On the one hand, if he's a liar, and there's an
afterlife, he is in danger of having his tail
feathers burned:
"But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the
abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers,
and sorcerers, and idolaters, and ALL LIARS,
shall have their part in the lake which burneth
with fire and brimstone: which is the second
death." -- Revelation 21:8
So being stupid is better.  But if there's no
afterlife, being stupid is worse.

never defines his terms.
>
A lie, of course, as expected from a relativistic
doggie in general and from Harrie especially.
Another example of who is doing the "spitting, insulting
and slandering." :-))

On Sat, 10 Aug 2024 3:45:25 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
 > Easy one, Harrie. t is indication of one clock (Earth)
 > t' is the indication of the other (GPS satellite).
 > And they are equal, against the moronic prophecies
 > of your idiot guru; that's why you're trying to
 > delete one of them from the reality.
>
And poor lying piece of shit Harrie did surely
notice that because it has answerred.
And yet another example of who is doing the "spitting,
insulting and slandering." :-))

Fortunetely for your bunch of idiots  you're
not THAT stupid. You only insist they should
be set to agree with your fantasies, but you're
setting them ordinary way so they indicate
t'=t, like always, and those alleged clocks
"agreeing with natural phenomena" and
"confirming" your idiocies - exist only in
your sick delusions.
>
Sorry to say, but Wozniak appears to be the one with
"sick delusions" since motional and gravitational
time dilation are confirmed phenomena which would
>
And in the meantime in the real world - forbidden by
your bunch of idiots "improper" clocks keep measuring
t'=t, just like all serious clocks always did.
And yet another example of who is doing the "spitting,
insulting and slandering." :-))

Nobody sane is going to set clocks to agree with
your alleged "natural phenomena", and even the
hardest Shit fanatics are not really THAT stupid.
They only pretend.
And yet another example of who is doing the "spitting,
insulting and slandering." :-))
I tend to believe that Wozniak is not stupid, but very
clever.  That's too bad because there is mounting
evidence that there IS an an afterlife:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/21_grams_experiment
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_After_Life_(Moody_book)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heaven_Is_for_Real
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miracles_from_Heaven

Date Sujet#  Auteur
15 Jul 24 * Relativistic aberration208Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24 +* Re: Relativistic aberration103gharnagel
15 Jul 24 i+* Re: Relativistic aberration3Maciej Wozniak
15 Jul 24 ii`* Re: Relativistic aberration2Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24 ii `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Maciej Wozniak
15 Jul 24 i`* Re: Relativistic aberration99Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24 i `* Re: Relativistic aberration98gharnagel
15 Jul 24 i  `* Re: Relativistic aberration97Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24 i   `* Re: Relativistic aberration96gharnagel
15 Jul 24 i    +- Re: Relativistic aberration1Maciej Wozniak
15 Jul 24 i    +- Re: Relativistic aberration1Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24 i    `* Re: Relativistic aberration93Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24 i     `* Re: Relativistic aberration92gharnagel
15 Jul 24 i      `* Re: Relativistic aberration91Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24 i       `* Re: Relativistic aberration90gharnagel
16 Jul 24 i        +* Re: Relativistic aberration88Richard Hachel
16 Jul 24 i        i`* Re: Relativistic aberration87gharnagel
16 Jul 24 i        i `* Re: Relativistic aberration86Richard Hachel
16 Jul 24 i        i  `* Re: Relativistic aberration85gharnagel
17 Jul 24 i        i   `* Re: Relativistic aberration84Thomas Heger
17 Jul 24 i        i    `* Re: Relativistic aberration83gharnagel
17 Jul 24 i        i     +* Re: Relativistic aberration75Maciej Wozniak
17 Jul 24 i        i     i`* Re: Relativistic aberration74gharnagel
17 Jul 24 i        i     i `* Re: Relativistic aberration73Maciej Wozniak
18 Jul 24 i        i     i  +* Re: Relativistic aberration3gharnagel
18 Jul 24 i        i     i  i+- Re: Relativistic aberration1Reign Batura
31 Jul 24 i        i     i  i`- Re: Relativistic aberration1gharnagel
10 Aug 24 i        i     i  `* Re: Relativistic aberration69gharnagel
10 Aug 24 i        i     i   `* Re: Relativistic aberration68Maciej Wozniak
11 Aug 24 i        i     i    `* Re: Relativistic aberration67gharnagel
11 Aug 24 i        i     i     +- Re: Relativistic aberration1Kalakos Angelopoulos
11 Aug 24 i        i     i     `* Re: Relativistic aberration65gharnagel
11 Aug 24 i        i     i      +- Re: Relativistic aberration1Szűcs Kővári
11 Aug 24 i        i     i      `* Re: Relativistic aberration63gharnagel
11 Aug 24 i        i     i       `* Re: Relativistic aberration62gharnagel
11 Aug 24 i        i     i        +* Re: Relativistic aberration5Ross Finlayson
11 Aug 24 i        i     i        i`* Re: Relativistic aberration4Ross Finlayson
11 Aug 24 i        i     i        i `* Re: Relativistic aberration3Python
12 Aug 24 i        i     i        i  `* Re: Relativistic aberration2gharnagel
12 Aug 24 i        i     i        i   `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Ross Finlayson
12 Aug 24 i        i     i        `* Re: Relativistic aberration56Maciej Wozniak
12 Aug 24 i        i     i         `* Re: Relativistic aberration55gharnagel
12 Aug 24 i        i     i          `* Re: Relativistic aberration54Maciej Wozniak
12 Aug 24 i        i     i           +* Re: Relativistic aberration4Python
12 Aug 24 i        i     i           i`* Re: Relativistic aberration3Python
12 Aug 24 i        i     i           i `* Re: Relativistic aberration2Maciej Wozniak
12 Aug 24 i        i     i           i  `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Python
12 Aug 24 i        i     i           `* Re: Relativistic aberration49gharnagel
12 Aug 24 i        i     i            `* Re: Relativistic aberration48Maciej Wozniak
12 Aug 24 i        i     i             +* Re: Relativistic aberration3Python
12 Aug 24 i        i     i             i`* Re: Relativistic aberration2Maciej Wozniak
12 Aug 24 i        i     i             i `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Python
12 Aug 24 i        i     i             `* Re: Relativistic aberration44gharnagel
12 Aug 24 i        i     i              +* Re: Relativistic aberration40Maciej Wozniak
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i`* Re: Relativistic aberration39gharnagel
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i +* Re: Relativistic aberration37Python
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i+* Re: Relativistic aberration13Ross Finlayson
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i ii+* Re: Relativistic aberration11Python
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii`* Re: Relativistic aberration10Ross Finlayson
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii `* Re: Relativistic aberration9Python
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii  `* Re: Relativistic aberration8Ross Finlayson
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii   +- Re: Relativistic aberration1Python
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii   `* Re: Relativistic aberration6Javis Orbán
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii    `* Re: Relativistic aberration5Thomas Heger
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii     +* Re: Relativistic aberration2Athel Cornish-Bowden
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii     i`- Re: Relativistic aberration1Balabaanoff Bibitinsky
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii     `* Re: Relativistic aberration2Python
15 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii      `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Thomas Heger
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i ii`- Re: Relativistic aberration1Mozhar Bairamkulov
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i`* Re: Relativistic aberration23gharnagel
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i `* Re: Relativistic aberration22Python
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i  `* Re: Relativistic aberration21gharnagel
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i   `* Re: Relativistic aberration20Python
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i    `* Re: Relativistic aberration19gharnagel
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i     `* Re: Relativistic aberration18Richard Hachel
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      +* Re: Relativistic aberration5gharnagel
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i+* Re: Relativistic aberration2Richard Hachel
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      ii`- Re: Relativistic aberration1gharnagel
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i`* Re: Relativistic aberration2Richard Hachel
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Ross Finlayson
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      +* Re: Relativistic aberration10Paul.B.Andersen
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i`* Re: Relativistic aberration9Python
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i `* "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts8Python
15 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i  +* Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts2Python
15 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i  i`- Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts1Richard Hachel
15 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i  `* Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts5Richard Hachel
15 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i   `* Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts4Python
15 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i    +* Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts2Richard Hachel
15 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i    i`- Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts1Python
15 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i    `- Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts1Athel Cornish-Bowden
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      +- Re: Relativistic aberration1Python
15 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Thomas Heger
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Maciej Wozniak
12 Aug 24 i        i     i              `* Re: Relativistic aberration3Josh Vassilopulos
12 Aug 24 i        i     i               `* Re: Relativistic aberration2Python
12 Aug 24 i        i     i                `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Pete Beaulieu
18 Jul 24 i        i     `* Re: Relativistic aberration7Thomas Heger
18 Jul 24 i        i      `* Re: Relativistic aberration6gharnagel
19 Jul 24 i        i       `* Re: Relativistic aberration5Thomas Heger
19 Jul 24 i        i        `* Re: Relativistic aberration4Python
19 Jul 24 i        i         +- Re: Relativistic aberration1gharnagel
20 Jul 24 i        i         `* Re: Relativistic aberration2Thomas Heger
16 Jul 24 i        `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Richard Hachel
31 Jul 24 +* Re: Relativistic aberration67Sylvia Else
7 Aug 24 `* Re: Relativistic aberration37JanPB

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal