Re: Muon paradox

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : Re: Muon paradox
De : clzb93ynxj (at) *nospam* att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 01. Apr 2025, 20:24:35
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <3c6e1946ae4fe81ace056291f873b1ac@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
On Tue, 1 Apr 2025 18:41:39 +0000, Ross Finlayson wrote:

On 04/01/2025 11:26 AM, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
Den 01.04.2025 17:38, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:
>
I mean, "Yes, muons have mass, and their mass is approximately 207 times
that of an electron, with a value of about 105.7 MeV/c², according to
Britannica [10, 17] and other sources [1, 3, 6, 7]." -Google AI
So they must move faster in the atmosphere.
>
So since the mass of a  muon is 207 times the mass of an electron
it must fall 207 times faster than an electron? :-D
>
>
>
The inverse of frequency and wavelength with regards to waves or
the particles moving along as those are and calling that all
"electromagnetic radiation" is one of the great conflations
since the kinetic and nuclear and electromagnetic radiation
in both the long and short waves and the special optical light
and the three constants "c" about the light's and the electromagnetic
and electrostatics', and about waves whether it's velocity,
help illustrate that according to that kind of conflation,
muons don't so much belong to SR, nor make much sense from
the conflated and ignorant SR-ianism.
>
Not so much that's their fault, as, doesn't belong to them.
Then, if it is not SR time dilation due to high speeds, it could be GR
time dilation due to gravity without gravity increasing the speed but
just causing time dilation. The only problem is that time dilation is ad
hoc fiction divorced from rational physics.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
31 Mar 25 * Muon paradox130LaurenceClarkCrossen
31 Mar 25 +- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
31 Mar 25 +* Re: Muon paradox21LaurenceClarkCrossen
31 Mar 25 i`* Re: Muon paradox20LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr 25 i `* Re: Muon paradox19Richard Hachel
1 Apr 25 i  +- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr 25 i  +* Re: Muon paradox3LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr 25 i  i`* Re: Muon paradox2LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr 25 i  i `- Re: Muon paradox1Ross Finlayson
1 Apr 25 i  `* Re: Muon paradox14guido wugi
1 Apr 25 i   +* Re: Muon paradox2Richard Hachel
1 Apr 25 i   i`- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr 25 i   +- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr 25 i   +- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr 25 i   `* Re: Muon paradox9LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr 25 i    `* Re: Muon paradox8Paul.B.Andersen
1 Apr 25 i     +* Re: Muon paradox3Ross Finlayson
1 Apr 25 i     i`* Re: Muon paradox2LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr 25 i     i `- Re: Muon paradox1Ross Finlayson
1 Apr 25 i     `* Re: Muon paradox4LaurenceClarkCrossen
2 Apr 25 i      `* Re: Muon paradox3Paul.B.Andersen
2 Apr 25 i       +- Re: Muon paradox1Rubin Yablokov
2 Apr 25 i       `- Re: Muon paradox1Ross Finlayson
1 Apr 25 +* Re: Muon paradox10LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr 25 i`* Re: Muon paradox9Paul.B.Andersen
1 Apr 25 i +- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr 25 i `* Re: Muon paradox7LaurenceClarkCrossen
2 Apr 25 i  `* Re: Muon paradox6Paul.B.Andersen
2 Apr 25 i   +- Re: Muon paradox1Maciej Wozniak
2 Apr 25 i   `* Re: Muon paradox4LaurenceClarkCrossen
3 Apr 25 i    `* Re: Muon paradox3Paul.B.Andersen
3 Apr 25 i     +- Re: Muon paradox1Maciej Wozniak
3 Apr 25 i     `- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr 25 +* Re: Muon paradox91Paul.B.Andersen
1 Apr 25 i+- Re: Muon paradox1Maciej Wozniak
1 Apr 25 i+* Re: Muon paradox6Paul.B.Andersen
1 Apr 25 ii+* Re: Muon paradox2Maciej Wozniak
1 Apr 25 iii`- Re: Muon paradox1Edilberto Gayazov
1 Apr 25 ii+- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr 25 ii`* Re: Muon paradox2LaurenceClarkCrossen
2 Apr 25 ii `- Re: Muon paradox1Paul.B.Andersen
1 Apr 25 i+* Re: Muon paradox54LaurenceClarkCrossen
2 Apr 25 ii`* Re: Muon paradox53Paul.B.Andersen
2 Apr 25 ii +* Re: Muon paradox15LaurenceClarkCrossen
3 Apr 25 ii i`* Re: Muon paradox14Paul.B.Andersen
3 Apr 25 ii i +* Re: Muon paradox12Maciej Wozniak
3 Apr 25 ii i i`* Re: Muon paradox11Darling Vassilopulos
3 Apr 25 ii i i `* Re: Muon paradox10Maciej Wozniak
3 Apr 25 ii i i  `* Re: Muon paradox9Richard Hachel
3 Apr 25 ii i i   +* Re: Muon paradox3LaurenceClarkCrossen
4 Apr 25 ii i i   i`* Re: Muon paradox2Richard Hachel
5 Apr 25 ii i i   i `- Re: Muon paradox1Thomas Heger
4 Apr 25 ii i i   +* Re: Muon paradox3Thomas Heger
4 Apr 25 ii i i   i+- Re: Muon paradox1Richard Hachel
5 Apr 25 ii i i   i`- Re: Muon paradox1Thomas Heger
4 Apr 25 ii i i   `* Re: Muon paradox2Richard Hachel
4 Apr 25 ii i i    `- Re: Muon paradox1Maciej Wozniak
3 Apr 25 ii i `- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
2 Apr 25 ii +* Re: Muon paradox2Aether Regained
2 Apr 25 ii i`- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
2 Apr 25 ii `* Re: Muon paradox35LaurenceClarkCrossen
3 Apr 25 ii  `* Re: Muon paradox34Paul.B.Andersen
3 Apr 25 ii   +- Re: Muon paradox1Maciej Wozniak
3 Apr 25 ii   +* Re: Muon paradox31LaurenceClarkCrossen
4 Apr 25 ii   i`* Re: Muon paradox30Paul.B.Andersen
4 Apr 25 ii   i +* Re: Muon paradox3Maciej Wozniak
4 Apr 25 ii   i i`* Re: Muon paradox2LaurenceClarkCrossen
5 Apr 25 ii   i i `- Re: Muon paradox1Richard Hachel
4 Apr 25 ii   i +* Re: Muon paradox11LaurenceClarkCrossen
5 Apr 25 ii   i i`* Re: Muon paradox10Paul.B.Andersen
5 Apr 25 ii   i i +- Re: Muon paradox1Richard Hachel
5 Apr 25 ii   i i +* Re: Muon paradox7LaurenceClarkCrossen
6 Apr 25 ii   i i i`* Re: Muon paradox6Paul.B.Andersen
6 Apr 25 ii   i i i +* Re: Muon paradox3LaurenceClarkCrossen
7 Apr 25 ii   i i i i`* Re: Muon paradox2Paul.B.Andersen
7 Apr 25 ii   i i i i `- Re: Muon paradox1Maciej Wozniak
7 Apr 25 ii   i i i `* Re: Muon paradox2LaurenceClarkCrossen
7 Apr 25 ii   i i i  `- Re: Muon paradox1Maciej Wozniak
6 Apr 25 ii   i i `- Re: Muon paradox1Maciej Wozniak
5 Apr 25 ii   i `* Re: Muon paradox15Paul.B.Andersen
5 Apr 25 ii   i  +* Re: Muon paradox6Paul.B.Andersen
5 Apr 25 ii   i  i+- Re: Muon paradox1Ross Finlayson
5 Apr 25 ii   i  i+- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
5 Apr 25 ii   i  i+- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
5 Apr 25 ii   i  i+- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
5 Apr 25 ii   i  i`- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
5 Apr 25 ii   i  `* Re: Muon paradox8LaurenceClarkCrossen
6 Apr 25 ii   i   `* Re: Muon paradox7Paul.B.Andersen
6 Apr 25 ii   i    +* Re: Muon paradox4Richard Hachel
6 Apr 25 ii   i    i+- Re: Muon paradox1Maciej Wozniak
7 Apr 25 ii   i    i`* Re: Muon paradox2Thomas Heger
7 Apr 25 ii   i    i `- Re: Muon paradox1Richard Hachel
6 Apr 25 ii   i    +- Re: Muon paradox1Maciej Wozniak
7 Apr 25 ii   i    `- Re: Muon paradox1Paul.B.Andersen
3 Apr 25 ii   `- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr 25 i+- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
9 Apr 25 i+* Re: Muon paradox4gharnagel
9 Apr 25 ii`* Re: Muon paradox3Paul.B.Andersen
9 Apr 25 ii `* Re: Muon paradox2gharnagel
10 Apr13:23 ii  `- Re: Muon paradox1Shirley Dovgusha
10 Apr21:02 i`* Re: Muon paradox24Aether Regained
1 Apr 25 +* Re: Muon paradox3Kent Bazhukov
8 Apr 25 `* Re: Muon paradox3Maciej Wozniak

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal