Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,
De : hertz778 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (rhertz)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 19. Sep 2024, 00:08:46
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <3fddf5a7bc291abaf2bc49d856d87fcb@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
To Paul and Lawrence: I´ll try to explain ONE MORE TIME why the H-K
experiment was a massive FRAUD.
PART 1: Data from the two flights (multiple segments):
FINAL RESULTS, AS PUBLISHED IN 1972 IN SCIENCE MAGAZINE (values are in
nanoseconds)
1.1 Starting 4 October 1971, eastward flights lasted 65 hours, with 41
accumulated hours of flight.
Predicted for GR (eastward flight): +144  ± 14
Predicted for SR (eastward flight): -184  ± 18
THEORETICAL TOTAL EASTWARD FLIGHT: -40  ± 23
MEASURED TOTAL EASTWARD FLIGHT: -59  ± 10
1.2 Starting 13 October 1971, westward flights lasted 80.3 hours, with
48.6 accumulated hours of flight.
Predicted for GR (westward flight): +179  ± 18
Predicted for SR (westward flight): +96  ± 10
THEORETICAL TOTAL WESTWARD FLIGHT: +275 ± 21
MEASURED TOTAL WESTWARD FLIGHT: +273 ± 7
2. INSTRUMENTS USED FOR THE EXPERIMENT
- 6 HP 5060 A (laboratory model, not the portable HP 5061 A)
   - 2 HP 5060 A for the eastward flights (several segments, with many
take-off, landing and delays).
   - 2 different HP 5060 A Cs atomic clocks for the westward flights.
   - 2 different HP 5060 A Cs atomic clocks (reference), located in
Washington D.C.)
- 2 HP 5360A Time Measurement instruments, one used by H-K in their
flights, and the other used in
  the Naval Observatory Lab (Washington D.C.).
  The main objective of these two HP 5360 A was TO MEASURE THE SHORT
DIFFERENCES IN TIME from each of
  the THREE PAIRS of HP 5060 A, by taking (and storing, written at hand,
more than 5,000 single shot
  measurements. This data was used TO STATISTICALLY CALIBRATE (to cook)
differences of time on each
  pair of atomic clocks (4 used in the planes, and two in Washington
D.C.).
3. WHERE IS THE MAIN HOAX OF THE EXPERIMENT?
Have VERY PRESENT that the two pairs of traveling clocks HAD NO
MECHANISMS INVOLVED for real time
comparison with the pair of reference clocks in Washington D.C.
The above paragraph IS CRUCIAL TO UNDERSTAND WHY THE EXPERIMENT WAS AN
HOAX, being the perpetrators FREE TO ACCOMMODATE THE RECOLLECTED DATA
ONLY WHEN THE EXPERIMENT FINISHED, and the SIX CLOCKS were
sent to the Naval Observatory (145.3 hours PLUS 1 week between east and
west flights. Total: 313 hours).
Then, and ONLY THEN, with the six atomic clocks side by side in the lab,
A COMPARISON OF TIME DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE REFERENCE PAIR AND EACH SET
OF TRAVELING CLOCKS COULD BE PERFORMED (at will).
I REMARK THIS: There was NO WAY to know (in real time) the differences
in time between the flying clocks and the reference clocks. OTHERWISE,
they would (proudly) have been presented the EVOLUTION of the
differences as time and distance accumulated during the 313 hours that
the experiment lasted.
To that time, add many more hours for the lab setup, in order to measure
each traveling clock with the reference clocks.
What they obtained was a HUGE AMOUNT OF DATA (5,000+ onboard
measurements, plus an equivalent amount for the clocks in the lab),
which HAD TO BE PROCESSED in order to present it (as a summary) ONE YEAR
AFTER.
To obtain the "MEASUREMENTS" for each flight (east, west), THEORETICAL
ASSERTIONS had to be used to
separate the "measured data", and split it INTO TWO SEPARATE FICTITIOUS
MEASUREMENTS, which never existed.
The above is based on the CRUEL REALITY BEHIND THE EXPERIMENT, which is
that NO REAL TIME COMMUNICATION EXISTED BETWEEN THE SIX CLOCKS. Only ONE
VALUE, OBTAINED AFTER THE EXPERIMENT WAS DONE.
If any of you, relativists, can't understand the above explanations, I
strongly suggest that you find another hobby that do not require BLIND
FAITH IN WHAT IS PUBLISHED. Plus, a new IQ test could help you to
understand the capabilities of your minds a little more.
THINK!!
DON'T JUST BELIEVE. THINK!!

Date Sujet#  Auteur
12 Sep 24 * Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,106rhertz
12 Sep 24 +- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1Python
12 Sep 24 +* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,35LaurenceClarkCrossen
12 Sep 24 i+* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,11rhertz
12 Sep 24 ii`* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,10LaurenceClarkCrossen
12 Sep 24 ii +* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,7rhertz
12 Sep 24 ii i+- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1LaurenceClarkCrossen
12 Sep 24 ii i+- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1LaurenceClarkCrossen
13 Sep 24 ii i+- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1Paul.B.Andersen
13 Sep 24 ii i+- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Sep 24 ii i+- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
15 Sep 24 ii i`- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1LaurenceClarkCrossen
13 Sep 24 ii `* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,2Mikko
13 Sep 24 ii  `- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1LaurenceClarkCrossen
12 Sep 24 i`* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,23Richard Hachel
12 Sep 24 i `* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,22LaurenceClarkCrossen
12 Sep 24 i  `* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,21Richard Hachel
12 Sep 24 i   +* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,19LaurenceClarkCrossen
12 Sep 24 i   i`* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,18Richard Hachel
13 Sep 24 i   i `* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,17rhertz
13 Sep 24 i   i  +- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Sep 24 i   i  `* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,15Paul.B.Andersen
17 Sep 24 i   i   `* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,14ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
17 Sep 24 i   i    `* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,13rhertz
17 Sep 24 i   i     +* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,11LaurenceClarkCrossen
17 Sep 24 i   i     i`* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,10Richard Hachel
17 Sep 24 i   i     i `* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,9Python
17 Sep 24 i   i     i  `* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,8Richard Hachel
17 Sep 24 i   i     i   `* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,7Python
18 Sep 24 i   i     i    `* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,6Python
18 Sep 24 i   i     i     +* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,3rhertz
18 Sep 24 i   i     i     i+- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1Paul.B.Andersen
21 Sep 24 i   i     i     i`- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1Ross Finlayson
18 Sep 24 i   i     i     `* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,2Richard Hachel
18 Sep 24 i   i     i      `- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1Python
17 Sep 24 i   i     `- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1Paul.B.Andersen
12 Sep 24 i   `- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1Python
12 Sep 24 +- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1LaurenceClarkCrossen
12 Sep 24 +- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1LaurenceClarkCrossen
12 Sep 24 +- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1LaurenceClarkCrossen
13 Sep 24 +* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,32rhertz
13 Sep 24 i+* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,30LaurenceClarkCrossen
13 Sep 24 ii+- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1LaurenceClarkCrossen
13 Sep 24 ii+* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,3rhertz
13 Sep 24 iii`* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,2rhertz
13 Sep 24 iii `- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1LaurenceClarkCrossen
19 Sep 24 ii`* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,25rhertz
19 Sep 24 ii `* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,24rhertz
19 Sep 24 ii  +* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,5rhertz
19 Sep 24 ii  i+* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,3LaurenceClarkCrossen
19 Sep 24 ii  ii`* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,2rhertz
19 Sep 24 ii  ii `- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1LaurenceClarkCrossen
19 Sep 24 ii  i`- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1LaurenceClarkCrossen
19 Sep 24 ii  `* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,18ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
19 Sep 24 ii   +- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1LaurenceClarkCrossen
19 Sep 24 ii   `* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,16rhertz
19 Sep 24 ii    +* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,12rhertz
19 Sep 24 ii    i`* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,11ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
19 Sep 24 ii    i +* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,2ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
19 Sep 24 ii    i i`- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1Maciej Wozniak
19 Sep 24 ii    i `* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,8rhertz
19 Sep 24 ii    i  +* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,6ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
19 Sep 24 ii    i  i`* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,5rhertz
19 Sep 24 ii    i  i `* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,4ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
19 Sep 24 ii    i  i  `* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,3rhertz
19 Sep 24 ii    i  i   +- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
19 Sep 24 ii    i  i   `- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1LaurenceClarkCrossen
19 Sep 24 ii    i  `- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1Paul.B.Andersen
19 Sep 24 ii    +- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1Paul.B.Andersen
19 Sep 24 ii    +- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1LaurenceClarkCrossen
19 Sep 24 ii    `- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1LaurenceClarkCrossen
13 Sep 24 i`- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Sep 24 +- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1rhertz
17 Sep 24 +* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,3Volney
17 Sep 24 i`* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,2Volney
17 Sep 24 i `- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1Maciej Wozniak
18 Sep 24 +* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,6rhertz
18 Sep 24 i`* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,5ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
18 Sep 24 i `* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,4ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
18 Sep 24 i  `* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,3rhertz
18 Sep 24 i   `* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,2ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
18 Sep 24 i    `- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1Maciej Wozniak
18 Sep 24 +* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,6rhertz
18 Sep 24 i+- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1Ross Finlayson
18 Sep 24 i`* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,4ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
18 Sep 24 i +- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1Maciej Wozniak
18 Sep 24 i +- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1Paul.B.Andersen
18 Sep 24 i `- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1Ross Finlayson
19 Sep 24 +* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,5J. J. Lodder
19 Sep 24 i+- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1Maciej Wozniak
19 Sep 24 i`* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,3rhertz
20 Sep 24 i `* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,2J. J. Lodder
20 Sep 24 i  `- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1Maciej Wozniak
20 Sep 24 +* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,7rhertz
20 Sep 24 i+* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,3rhertz
21 Sep 24 ii`* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,2Paul.B.Andersen
22 Sep 24 ii `- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1Maciej Wozniak
20 Sep 24 i`* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,3Paul.B.Andersen
20 Sep 24 i `* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,2rhertz
21 Sep 24 i  `- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1Paul.B.Andersen
22 Sep 24 `* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,6rhertz

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal