Liste des Groupes | Revenir à p relativity |
>There has been considerable interplay between mathematicians and
On 04/30/2025 06:41 AM, gharnagel wrote:>https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2010/09/nist-pair-aluminum-atomic-clocks-reveal-einsteins-relativity-personal-scale
I find the AI discourse rather shallow. There were no mentions of
more recent experiments which support relativity not at all dependent
on muons:
>
>>>
>
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5253894/
>
"Relativity in the Global Positioning System"
>
https://www.nature.com/articles/nature01997
>
"A test of general relativity using radio links with the Cassini
spacecraft"
>
On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 3:42:29 +0000, Ross Finlayson wrote:>>
Gravitational singularities rather exist, even if as regards to
the "cosmic censorship" or "raw singularities", the wobbles as
they may be result an unboundedly large concentration even if
with a vanishingly small extent or duration.
Singularities only appear in theories, not in reality. Their
presence indicates that the theory has exceeded its domain of
applicability.
Mathematics _owes_ physics better mathematics of infinities
and singularities, because infinitesimals and multiplicities
are in effect in dynamics of continuous change.
Singularity theories are just half-accounts of multiplicity theories.“as far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are
When they asked Einstein "is the universe infinite" he said"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity,
something along the lines of "it isn't not".
It's pretty well agreed we're looking at a field theoryI'm not sure about that. Those are mathematical models
and a gauge theory and over a continuous manifold,
.....Actually, it's a limit on a model. If you want a larger
So, the "domain of applicability" here is "a physics",
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.