Liste des Groupes | Revenir à p relativity |
>So L'il Wozzie-boy, self-proclaimed information
W dniu 28.08.2024 o 14:54, gharnagel pisze:>>
On Wed, 28 Aug 2024 5:42:04 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:>>
W dniu 28.08.2024 o 06:08, gharnagel pisze:>>
Le 27/08/2024 à 16:51, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :>>
No clocks were ever accelerated in any accelerator.
It's an impudent lie believable only by fanatic idiots.
This is another of Wozniak's multitudinous prevarications.
He tacitly accepts atomic clocks when he asserts his false
GPS t' = t baloney (t' is the time kept by the satellite
clock which is NOT t by design). Atomic clocks keep time
by Cs-133 atoms, so atoms are clocks.
No they are not, you simply don't know
what a clock is, just like most (if not
all) of relativistic idiots.
https://www.istockphoto.com/pl/search/2/image-film?phrase=clock
Wozniak lacks sufficient vision and is woefully ignorant of
the information he worships:
>
https://www.britannica.com/technology/atomic-clock
Harmagel is lying and slandering withaut any
basement, as usual. Nothing changes,
https://www.istockphoto.com/pl/search/2/image-film?phrase=clock
clocks are like that, an atom is not.
That's right, not the first, because I haven't done>And - anyone can check GPS, or TAI, or UTC>
- atomic clocks don't keep "time by
Cs-133 atom", they keep something else.
Wozzie keeps something else: it's called lying.
Not the first Harrie's demonstration
of denying the reality.
I tried being nice to Wozzie-liar to reach his better side,>Or rather, any relativistic doggie will spit>
at anyone not kneeling before his beloved
idiocies with all its might.
Woxniak is projecting his own despicable behavior as he
insults and slanders his way through his so-called life
Harmagel is projecting his own despicable behavior as he
insults and slanders his way through his so-called life
Woziie-liar is in deep, deep denial. He needs serious>>where the OP was about what SR predicts for an
observer moving at c/2.
So experiments are the sine qua non of the validity of
any theory,
They are not,
but people much wiser than you made the mistake too.So it's a mistake to check the validity of a theory with
Anyway, you don't need them when the theory is inconsistent,Says the congenital liar and denier of reality.
like the mumble of your idiot guru was.
Which doesn't happen with relativity. Wozzie has delusionsSo L'il Wozzie can conclude assumptions are inconsistent>
without examining them?
Assumptions are inconsistent when they give
some conclusions denying each other,
Wozzie-liar is the one saying that, so that makes him>Like - pretending that GPS clock are not real,>
No one is saying that.
But some idiot was saying that.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.