Re: Weakness in the results of the three tests of GR shown in rhe lasr century,.

On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 18:34:43 +0000, rhertz wrote:

It's widely known that the precession of Mercury's orbit, as well as of
other planets, have an orbital value that is +/- 500% variation over the
average of 0.43"/year (2.0847E-6 rad/year).

Yes, of course. Both Paul and I have presented simulation results, so
this fact should be very well known among the denizens of these groups.

Due to numerous perturbations over its orbit, the projected 100 years
advance, being graphically represented, looks like a pseudo-random noise

No, not "pseudo-random" at all.

mounted over a linear progression with 0.43"/years (derived from
statistical averages). The peak noisy shift in the perihelion advance is
greater than 5"/year, with UNKNOWN PATTERN for its occurrence.

By no means "unknown". The pattern is dominated by a 12-year period
corresponding to Jupiter's orbit, with secondary contributions by the
other planets.

And more exact measurements than those done from Earth are only 35 years
old. The remaining years for the LAST CENTURY were measured from Earth's
observatories, with all the errors that it implies.

MESSENGER orbited Mercury between 2011-2015, providing extremely
precise distance measurements, down to a few meters.

Wait till 2025, when the Japanese spacecrafts orbiting Mercury start to
send more reliable data.

BepiColombo is a joint ESA-JAXA effort.

Then wait 100 years more to know the truth.
You are very convinced about precision of 1 nanosec and 1 micrometer on
the available data for solar system planets. This serves to describe you
as what your posts transpire: You are a gullible idiot.

How many times to you have to be told? The 16 digit precision of the
NASA Horizons output merely reflects the best decimal representation
of the ephemeris program output, and does not imply that the program
output is actually considered to be that accurate.