Re: Experiments Refute Einstein's 1905 Second Postulate

Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>

Am Freitag000019, 19.05.2023 um 20:23 schrieb Tom Roberts:

>
It OUGHT to be obvious that measurements by moving observers cannot
possibly affect the rod itself. So in that sense, "length contraction"
is not "physical" -- the rod is not affected [#].

>
Doesn't poor halfbrain TR believe the results of Holy
Measurements?

Poor eighth-brain is trying to obscure the whole situation once again.  He
pretends there is only one "Holy measurement" but the fact is that there are
many who can be making the measurement, each traveling at a different speed,
and each getting a different value.  The only "Holy measurement" would be by
the one at rest with respect to the rod, which would be its proper length.
https://psychcentral.com/health/lying-by-omission