Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed

On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 10:42:00 +0000, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
 

On 2024-10-13 01:01:03 +0000, Bertietaylor said:
>

On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 9:52:47 +0000, J. J. Lodder wrote:
>

Aether Regained <AetherRegaind@somewhere.in.the.aether> wrote:
>

bertietaylor:

The violation of inertia with a new design rail gun in motor mode
Arindam Banerjee,
HTN Research Pty Ltd. Melbourne
10 Nov 2023
(All rights reserved)
>
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/VtFeGAkIABg/m/CLPzLRElAwAJ
>
***
>
Experiments (2022) showing my invention of a new kind of rail gun
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYtyOMbgiZ0
>
Which is improved upon in, and its potential for ejecting matter into
near space , and horizontal tunneling shown in
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o6pjy0Wvujs&t=19s
>
and the following shows how a new class of linear motor violating
inertia can be developed by arresting the momentum of the armature and
imparting that to the whole system, giving it an increased velocity
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=idsIuzEajTc&t=2s
>

>
@Arindam (there is no need to use the transparent bertietaylor alias):
>
If the aether is fluid-like, which I believe it to be, as opposed to
your belief that the aether is solid-like, then there is a simple
disproof of your "violation of inertia" claim:
>
There is no violation of inertia or conservation-of-momentum in fluid
mechanics: any unseen/unaccounted for momentum is carried away by the
fluid!

>
As 'everybody' in the 19th century already knew:
the aether must be solid-like.
A fluid aether cannot support transversverse waves,
and this is what electromagnetic waves obviously are.
>
As for Woofster's claims about inertia violations:
they are bunk, with or without an aether,
>
Jan

>
Another e=mcc chap denying reality of inertia violation by Arindam's
rail gun experiment.

>
Where is this work published (in a serious journal)?

 
Why bother about journals? Why not look at what has been done?