Liste des Groupes | Revenir à p relativity |
>Only in response to Wozniak's insults and slanders. He
W dniu 12.08.2024 o 14:53, gharnagel pisze:
>On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 4:33:02 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:>>>
Harrie asserts t'<>t,
Do I? How could I without knowing what t' and t are? :-))
>but when asked what t' is then - he's only spitting,>
insulting and slandering.
I wasn't the one calling people "trash"
You've used many others insults instead.
And slanders as well.
True, talking to fanatic, lying scumbagsAu contraire. It's that others have condescended
like you, Python and others I sadly have
to partially descend to your level.
Partially.
Of course different answers exist, depending>Let's try again: so, when t(time indicated>
by a ground base clock) is 2024-08-31
17:00:00.00000000 - t' (time indicated by
a satellite clock) will be? Consider the
simultaneity of the base.
Wozniak doesn't say WHERE the measurement of the
satellite clock is made. Of course,
Harrie lies and desperately tries
to pretend that an answer different
than "2024-08-31 17:00:00.00000000
with the precision of an acceptable
error" exists.
I've written it clearly: consider theAnd more examples of his insults and slanders.
simultaneity of the base. Not that it
makes any difference outside of the
gedanken world of your absurd delusions
- but you've got it.
Lies have short legs, sorry, trash.“Let me never fall into the vulgar mistake of
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.