Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,

You know of course what the error is.
BTW, what was your point?
--
Paul
******************************************
Had you read my previous post, you should have noticed the link that I
posted.
There, the formula for the SR part includes cos@, where @ is the
latitude.
Yet, the formula published by Hafele, which I used, don't include this
correction.
(τ - τ₀)/τ₀ = -(2RΩv + v²)/2c²
instead of
(τ - τ₀)/τ₀ = -(2RΩv cos@ + v²)/2c²
-----
And about that my calculation took more than 1 circulation around the
globe (39,658 Km instead of 36,900 Km following the Equator).
Also, it lacks the correction of cos@, which Hafele didn't disclose.
THIS is because that the data corrections (time, lengths) were made by
OTHER specialists, whom assisted him.
The above is because the flight's path for a complete circulation is FAR
from being a simple straight line at a give latitude.
Plus, another important set of CORRECTIONS were made by specialists,
considering (for the 10/11 segments of each flight), time spent
ascending and descending at each airport, with important changes in
velocity (no less than 20 lapses of more than 5 minutes each). Add,
also, more variables in the VELOCITY of each flight, which changed
constantly during each flight (due to atmospheric issues, etc.).
In total, the number of corrections, adjustments and "data
cherry-picking for EACH FLIGHT (and six clocks), involved no less than
15,000 numbers to be cooked (sorry, considered).
How much is the value of relativity in stock markets today?
Bye, Paul.