Re: Relativistic aberration

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : Re: Relativistic aberration
De : ross.a.finlayson (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Ross Finlayson)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 11. Aug 2024, 21:39:23
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <7nydnbqfqtEcvCT7nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
On 08/11/2024 01:35 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
On 08/11/2024 01:19 PM, gharnagel wrote:
On Sun, 11 Aug 2024 18:07:25 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>
W dniu 11.08.2024 o 19:49, gharnagel pisze:
>
On Sun, 11 Aug 2024 15:25:05 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>
Exactly, trash. Those alleged clocks having readings
as your idiot guru porophecied - exist only in
sick delusions of yours and your fellow idiots.
>
Clocks are human inventions, so smart humans will set
them to agree with natural phenomena.
>
Sorry, trash, they won't.
>
Denigration and prevarication aren't valid arguments.
>
Anyone can check GPS - oppositely, they will set them
to ignore natutral phenomena.
>
Wozniak asserts that "t' = t" in the GPS system, but he
never defines his terms.  Sometimes he demands he be
told what the clocks in orbit are reading, but he doesn't
specify the point where they should be read.  Since the
system sets the same time over the whole earth, it's
obviously not ignoring "natutral phenomena."
>
Those that set them to agree with their fantasies
will be disappointed.
>
Fortunetely for your bunch of idiots  you're
not THAT stupid. You only insist they should
be set to agree with your fantasies, but you're
setting them ordinary way so they indicate
t'=t, like always, and those alleged clocks
"agreeing with natural phenomena" and
"confirming" your idiocies - exist only in
your sick delusions.
>
Sorry to say, but Wozniak appears to be the one with
"sick delusions" since motional and gravitational
time dilation are confirmed phenomena which would
be apparent (in fact, was observed in the first
satellite launched) if not engineered to make the
orbital clocks agree with ground clocks -- only as
observed by the ground clocks.  So Wozniak deceives
when he claims "anyone can check the GPS" and that
they're set the "ordinary way so they t' = t."
>
How does he know they're set "the ordinary way"?
He doesn't, of course.  All the engineers who
designed the system have testified this is not so,
but Wozniak, who doesn't know how the system works,
vacuously asserts otherwise.  Case closed.
>
>
Well if you suss out that the equivalence principle,
that gravity is the same as acceleration, is a
terrestrial thing, and show that Hafaele-Keating flew
a particular path, and make for the rubidium laser
and the Pound-Rebka a bit of momentum, as it were,
then with that the Lense-Thirring and frame-dragging
is a thing, that GPS satellites as much advise their
differences as confirm them, lunar-laser ranging or
for Shapiro in the photon sector, then what you get
to is a real space-contraction that varies pretty
much according to the linear and the rotational,
with the linear carring space-frames in space contraction
and the rotational freely rotating in space-contraction,
and where for example the Aspect-type experiments are
a thing or Bell's, while even Michelson-Morley can be
considered with regards to where it's null, about the
particulars of the configuration of these experiments
in largely their terrestrial frame, there's that the
space-contraction and a fall-gravity fit most of the
same data of the critical experiments, while also
not being wrong about the Parameterized Post-Newtonian
Ephemeris, where lives Earth and its surrounds in their
orbits, terrestrial.
>
This isn't so different, yet, with a fuller dialectical
account of a deconstructive account and real continuum mechanics,
makes a better theory that isn't just broken by all the
missing impetus of supposed luminous matter and energy
in the entire cosmological survey, as that's thoroughly broken,
according to conscientious science.
>
Allais effect, ....
>
>
Cf. "Modern Tests of Relativistic Gravitational Theories"
https://www.google.com/search?q=Pound%20Rebka%20%22rubidium%22

Date Sujet#  Auteur
15 Jul 24 * Relativistic aberration208Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24 +* Re: Relativistic aberration103gharnagel
15 Jul 24 i+* Re: Relativistic aberration3Maciej Wozniak
15 Jul 24 ii`* Re: Relativistic aberration2Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24 ii `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Maciej Wozniak
15 Jul 24 i`* Re: Relativistic aberration99Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24 i `* Re: Relativistic aberration98gharnagel
15 Jul 24 i  `* Re: Relativistic aberration97Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24 i   `* Re: Relativistic aberration96gharnagel
15 Jul 24 i    +- Re: Relativistic aberration1Maciej Wozniak
15 Jul 24 i    +- Re: Relativistic aberration1Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24 i    `* Re: Relativistic aberration93Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24 i     `* Re: Relativistic aberration92gharnagel
15 Jul 24 i      `* Re: Relativistic aberration91Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24 i       `* Re: Relativistic aberration90gharnagel
16 Jul 24 i        +* Re: Relativistic aberration88Richard Hachel
16 Jul 24 i        i`* Re: Relativistic aberration87gharnagel
16 Jul 24 i        i `* Re: Relativistic aberration86Richard Hachel
16 Jul 24 i        i  `* Re: Relativistic aberration85gharnagel
17 Jul 24 i        i   `* Re: Relativistic aberration84Thomas Heger
17 Jul 24 i        i    `* Re: Relativistic aberration83gharnagel
17 Jul 24 i        i     +* Re: Relativistic aberration75Maciej Wozniak
17 Jul 24 i        i     i`* Re: Relativistic aberration74gharnagel
17 Jul 24 i        i     i `* Re: Relativistic aberration73Maciej Wozniak
18 Jul 24 i        i     i  +* Re: Relativistic aberration3gharnagel
18 Jul 24 i        i     i  i+- Re: Relativistic aberration1Reign Batura
31 Jul 24 i        i     i  i`- Re: Relativistic aberration1gharnagel
10 Aug 24 i        i     i  `* Re: Relativistic aberration69gharnagel
10 Aug 24 i        i     i   `* Re: Relativistic aberration68Maciej Wozniak
11 Aug 24 i        i     i    `* Re: Relativistic aberration67gharnagel
11 Aug 24 i        i     i     +- Re: Relativistic aberration1Kalakos Angelopoulos
11 Aug 24 i        i     i     `* Re: Relativistic aberration65gharnagel
11 Aug 24 i        i     i      +- Re: Relativistic aberration1Szűcs Kővári
11 Aug 24 i        i     i      `* Re: Relativistic aberration63gharnagel
11 Aug 24 i        i     i       `* Re: Relativistic aberration62gharnagel
11 Aug 24 i        i     i        +* Re: Relativistic aberration5Ross Finlayson
11 Aug 24 i        i     i        i`* Re: Relativistic aberration4Ross Finlayson
11 Aug 24 i        i     i        i `* Re: Relativistic aberration3Python
12 Aug 24 i        i     i        i  `* Re: Relativistic aberration2gharnagel
12 Aug 24 i        i     i        i   `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Ross Finlayson
12 Aug 24 i        i     i        `* Re: Relativistic aberration56Maciej Wozniak
12 Aug 24 i        i     i         `* Re: Relativistic aberration55gharnagel
12 Aug 24 i        i     i          `* Re: Relativistic aberration54Maciej Wozniak
12 Aug 24 i        i     i           +* Re: Relativistic aberration4Python
12 Aug 24 i        i     i           i`* Re: Relativistic aberration3Python
12 Aug 24 i        i     i           i `* Re: Relativistic aberration2Maciej Wozniak
12 Aug 24 i        i     i           i  `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Python
12 Aug 24 i        i     i           `* Re: Relativistic aberration49gharnagel
12 Aug 24 i        i     i            `* Re: Relativistic aberration48Maciej Wozniak
12 Aug 24 i        i     i             +* Re: Relativistic aberration3Python
12 Aug 24 i        i     i             i`* Re: Relativistic aberration2Maciej Wozniak
12 Aug 24 i        i     i             i `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Python
12 Aug 24 i        i     i             `* Re: Relativistic aberration44gharnagel
12 Aug 24 i        i     i              +* Re: Relativistic aberration40Maciej Wozniak
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i`* Re: Relativistic aberration39gharnagel
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i +* Re: Relativistic aberration37Python
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i+* Re: Relativistic aberration13Ross Finlayson
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i ii+* Re: Relativistic aberration11Python
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii`* Re: Relativistic aberration10Ross Finlayson
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii `* Re: Relativistic aberration9Python
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii  `* Re: Relativistic aberration8Ross Finlayson
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii   +- Re: Relativistic aberration1Python
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii   `* Re: Relativistic aberration6Javis Orbán
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii    `* Re: Relativistic aberration5Thomas Heger
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii     +* Re: Relativistic aberration2Athel Cornish-Bowden
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii     i`- Re: Relativistic aberration1Balabaanoff Bibitinsky
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii     `* Re: Relativistic aberration2Python
15 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii      `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Thomas Heger
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i ii`- Re: Relativistic aberration1Mozhar Bairamkulov
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i`* Re: Relativistic aberration23gharnagel
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i `* Re: Relativistic aberration22Python
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i  `* Re: Relativistic aberration21gharnagel
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i   `* Re: Relativistic aberration20Python
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i    `* Re: Relativistic aberration19gharnagel
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i     `* Re: Relativistic aberration18Richard Hachel
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      +* Re: Relativistic aberration5gharnagel
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i+* Re: Relativistic aberration2Richard Hachel
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      ii`- Re: Relativistic aberration1gharnagel
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i`* Re: Relativistic aberration2Richard Hachel
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Ross Finlayson
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      +* Re: Relativistic aberration10Paul.B.Andersen
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i`* Re: Relativistic aberration9Python
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i `* "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts8Python
15 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i  +* Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts2Python
15 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i  i`- Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts1Richard Hachel
15 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i  `* Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts5Richard Hachel
15 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i   `* Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts4Python
15 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i    +* Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts2Richard Hachel
15 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i    i`- Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts1Python
15 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i    `- Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts1Athel Cornish-Bowden
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      +- Re: Relativistic aberration1Python
15 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Thomas Heger
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Maciej Wozniak
12 Aug 24 i        i     i              `* Re: Relativistic aberration3Josh Vassilopulos
12 Aug 24 i        i     i               `* Re: Relativistic aberration2Python
12 Aug 24 i        i     i                `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Pete Beaulieu
18 Jul 24 i        i     `* Re: Relativistic aberration7Thomas Heger
18 Jul 24 i        i      `* Re: Relativistic aberration6gharnagel
19 Jul 24 i        i       `* Re: Relativistic aberration5Thomas Heger
19 Jul 24 i        i        `* Re: Relativistic aberration4Python
19 Jul 24 i        i         +- Re: Relativistic aberration1gharnagel
20 Jul 24 i        i         `* Re: Relativistic aberration2Thomas Heger
16 Jul 24 i        `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Richard Hachel
31 Jul 24 +* Re: Relativistic aberration67Sylvia Else
7 Aug 24 `* Re: Relativistic aberration37JanPB

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal