Re: Space and spacetime

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : Re: Space and spacetime
De : hitlong (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (gharnagel)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 18. Jun 2024, 14:53:52
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <8947f1c75ab514fb64386e4f565d0eb1@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>
W dniu 18.06.2024 o 14:46, gharnagel pisze:
>
Do you mean [gasp!] that scientists would LIE about their
experiments?
>
Of course they do.
Says the congenital liar :-))
Wozzie believes scientists are as dishonest as he is.

Your moronic religion is persuading you that they are superhuman
demigods free of the weaknesses of ordinary mortal worms
Wozzie's weaknesses are evident.  He judges the scientific world
by his own foibles, but he conveniently forgets that science works
by verification, not by his mumblings and grumblings.

- but only such an idiot as you are can believe that.
Only such an idiot as Wozzie-fool believes he himself has the keys
of truth and justice.

I don't know any rich theoretical physicists, nor any that hide.
Proposing
new ideas based upon extending present understanding is a good thing,
IMHO,
but proposing opinions based on fluff is not.
 “All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust,
sophisticated and well supported in logic and argument than others.”
-- Douglas Adams
 
What is said or written is not only
the basement, but also the only content
of science.
 Nope.  The foundation is what has been written about

Harrie, poor idiot, whatever is written must be written
about something. Even such an idiot should understand
that.
Wozzie-liar tries to take words out of context to justify
his prevarications.  But he is wrong again:  He writes
lots of words, but they are about NOTHING.

a phenomenon AND what has been verified by repeated
experiments.
And that's what Wozzie-liar tried to misrepresent.

Science is an advanced informational system.
 That's too narrow a definition.
>
That's not a definition, that's a [true] claim.
Nope, it's a definition that Wozzie-liar is trying to
foist unscrupulously on the debate.  And it is a false
definition and a false claim.

And Harrie-like idiots are trying to include
some Heavenly Force into it, because
1)they have no slighest clue how the system is
developed and maintained
2)it would make them Heavenly Chosen Ones.
 That sounds like Wozzie is describing himself :-)
>
I'm not the one hearing what the Nature is
speaking
Wozzie finally spoke the truth:  he NEVER listens to
what nature says.  He just makes up baloney and pretends
it's fact.

and announcing that to the mortal worms in Her name,
Harrie. It's you and your idiot gurus trying to blame
her for your moronic mumble.
Wozzie-idiot is the only one rumbling and mumbling and
grumbling here.  And lying his butt off, pretending
that t' = t for the GPS somehow disagrees with relativity
when, in fact, it was relativity that allowed t' = t
in the first place.  Wozzie-liar is a fatally dishonest
person.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
15 Jun 24 * Re: Space and spacetime108Roeidi Hegedüs
15 Jun 24 +* Re: Space and spacetime86Richard Hachel
15 Jun 24 i+* Re: Space and spacetime22Python
15 Jun 24 ii+* Re: Space and spacetime9Maciej Wozniak
15 Jun 24 iii`* Re: Space and spacetime8Python
15 Jun 24 iii +- Re: Space and spacetime1Maciej Wozniak
15 Jun 24 iii `* Re: Space and spacetime6Richard Hachel
15 Jun 24 iii  +* Re: Space and spacetime4Python
15 Jun 24 iii  i`* Re: Space and spacetime3Richard Hachel
16 Jun 24 iii  i `* Re: Space and spacetime2Alejandro Ślązak Mei
16 Jun 24 iii  i  `- Re: Space and spacetime1Moebius
16 Jun 24 iii  `- Re: Space and spacetime1Kory Muksinov Mak
15 Jun 24 ii`* Re: Space and spacetime12Richard Hachel
15 Jun 24 ii `* Re: Space and spacetime11Python
15 Jun 24 ii  +* Re: Space and spacetime9Python
16 Jun 24 ii  i`* Re: Space and spacetime8Maciej Wozniak
16 Jun 24 ii  i +- Re: Space and spacetime1Darin Stamatelos Zhai
16 Jun 24 ii  i `* Re: Space and spacetime6gharnagel
16 Jun 24 ii  i  +* Re: Space and spacetime2Osmel Pásztor Woo
22 Jun 24 ii  i  i`- Re: Space and spacetime1bertietaylor
16 Jun 24 ii  i  `* Re: Space and spacetime3Maciej Wozniak
17 Jun 24 ii  i   `* Re: Space and spacetime2gharnagel
17 Jun 24 ii  i    `- Re: Space and spacetime1Maciej Wozniak
15 Jun 24 ii  `- Re: Space and spacetime1Richard Hachel
16 Jun 24 i`* Re: Space and spacetime63JanPB
16 Jun 24 i +* Re: Space and spacetime61Richard Hachel
17 Jun 24 i i`* Re: Space and spacetime60Athel Cornish-Bowden
17 Jun 24 i i `* Re: Space and spacetime59Richard Hachel
18 Jun 24 i i  `* Re: Space and spacetime58gharnagel
18 Jun 24 i i   +- Re: Space and spacetime1Maciej Wozniak
18 Jun 24 i i   `* Re: Space and spacetime56Richard Hachel
18 Jun 24 i i    `* Re: Space and spacetime55Maciej Wozniak
18 Jun 24 i i     `* Re: Space and spacetime54gharnagel
18 Jun 24 i i      +* Re: Space and spacetime50Maciej Wozniak
18 Jun 24 i i      i+- Re: Space and spacetime1Python
18 Jun 24 i i      i`* Re: Space and spacetime48gharnagel
18 Jun 24 i i      i `* Re: Space and spacetime47gharnagel
19 Jun 24 i i      i  `* Re: Space and spacetime46Maciej Wozniak
19 Jun 24 i i      i   `* Re: Space and spacetime45gharnagel
19 Jun 24 i i      i    `* Re: Space and spacetime44Maciej Wozniak
19 Jun 24 i i      i     `* Re: Space and spacetime43gharnagel
20 Jun 24 i i      i      `* Re: Space and spacetime42gharnagel
20 Jun 24 i i      i       `* Re: Space and spacetime41gharnagel
20 Jun 24 i i      i        `* Re: Space and spacetime40Maciej Wozniak
20 Jun 24 i i      i         `* Re: Space and spacetime39gharnagel
20 Jun 24 i i      i          +* Re: Space and spacetime37Maciej Wozniak
20 Jun 24 i i      i          i`* Re: Space and spacetime36gharnagel
20 Jun 24 i i      i          i +* Re: Space and spacetime34Maciej Wozniak
21 Jun 24 i i      i          i i+* Re: Space and spacetime30gharnagel
21 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii`* Re: Space and spacetime29Maciej Wozniak
21 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii +* Re: Space and spacetime27gharnagel
21 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i`* Re: Space and spacetime26Maciej Wozniak
21 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i `* Re: Space and spacetime25gharnagel
22 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  +* Re: Space and spacetime23Maciej Wozniak
22 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  i`* Re: Space and spacetime22gharnagel
22 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  i `* Re: Space and spacetime21Maciej Wozniak
22 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  i  `* Re: Space and spacetime20gharnagel
22 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  i   `* Re: Space and spacetime19Maciej Wozniak
22 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  i    `* Re: Space and spacetime18gharnagel
22 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  i     `* Re: Space and spacetime17Maciej Wozniak
23 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  i      `* Re: Space and spacetime16gharnagel
23 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  i       +* Re: Space and spacetime14Maciej Wozniak
23 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  i       i`* Re: Space and spacetime13gharnagel
23 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  i       i +* Re: Space and spacetime11Maciej Wozniak
23 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  i       i i`* Re: Space and spacetime10gharnagel
23 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  i       i i `* Re: Space and spacetime9gharnagel
24 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  i       i i  `* Re: Space and spacetime8Maciej Wozniak
24 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  i       i i   +- Re: Space and spacetime1Hugo Madarász Hew
24 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  i       i i   `* Re: Space and spacetime6gharnagel
24 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  i       i i    `* Re: Space and spacetime5gharnagel
24 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  i       i i     `* Re: Space and spacetime4Maciej Wozniak
24 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  i       i i      `* Re: Space and spacetime3gharnagel
24 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  i       i i       `* Re: Space and spacetime2Maciej Wozniak
25 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  i       i i        `- Re: Space and spacetime1gharnagel
23 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  i       i `- Re: Space and spacetime1Ommy Vadász
23 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  i       `- Re: Space and spacetime1Dieter Bakhmatov Bian
22 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  `- Re: Space and spacetime1Nestor Evelina Fei
21 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii `- Re: Space and spacetime1Jerid Tsapaev Zhui
22 Jun 24 i i      i          i i`* Re: Space and spacetime3Volney
26 Jun 24 i i      i          i i +- Re: Space and spacetime1Zackery Dudunov
26 Jun 24 i i      i          i i `- Re: Space and spacetime1Westley Wojewódzki
22 Jun 24 i i      i          i `- Re: Space and spacetime1Malvin Deangela
20 Jun 24 i i      i          `- Re: Space and spacetime1Richard Hachel
18 Jun 24 i i      +* Re: Space and spacetime2Richard Hachel
19 Jun 24 i i      i`- Re: Space and spacetime1Moody Slootmaekers Hong
18 Jun 24 i i      `- Re: Space and spacetime1Richard Hachel
17 Jun 24 i `- Re: Space and spacetime1Jassen Christakos
27 Jun 24 `* Re: Space and spacetime21bertietaylor
27 Jun 24  `* Re: Space and spacetime20Volney
27 Jun 24   +- Re: Space and spacetime1Arindam Banerjee
27 Jun 24   +* Re: Space and spacetime2Arindam Banerjee
27 Jun 24   i`- Re: Space and spacetime1Arindam Banerjee
27 Jun 24   +* Re: Space and spacetime6Maciej Wozniak
28 Jun 24   i`* Re: Space and spacetime5bertietaylor
28 Jun 24   i `* Re: Space and spacetime4Beuford Turarov
28 Jun 24   i  `* Re: Space and spacetime3bertietaylor
29 Jun 24   i   `* Re: Space and spacetime2nisha parveen
29 Jun 24   i    `- Re: Space and spacetime1bertietaylor
27 Jun 24   +* Re: Space and spacetime7Jim Pennino
30 Jun 24   i`* Re: Space and spacetime6Arindam Banerjee
30 Jun 24   i +* Re: Space and spacetime4gharnagel
30 Jun 24   i `- Re: Space and spacetime1Jim Pennino
27 Jun 24   +- Re: Space and spacetime1Harlie Paraskos
27 Jun 24   +- Re: Space and spacetime1Baudilio Ibáñez Lang
27 Jun 24   `- Re: Space and spacetime1Bubba Romão Mao

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal