Sujet : Re: Relativistic aberration
De : hitlong (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (gharnagel)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativityDate : 13. Aug 2024, 16:15:30
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <964f235bdecde9d651c4352ec86d1fea@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 13:54:52 +0000, Python wrote:
>
Le 13/08/2024 à 15:47, gharnagel a écrit :
>
On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 13:27:10 +0000, Python wrote:
>
This is complete BS.
>
Okay, so you aren't curious. Even about the AATIP stuff?
>
>
https://video.search.yahoo.com/search/video?fr=ymyy-t&ei=UTF-8&p=aatip+ufo+footage#id=2&vid=7bfc7658cf746fc27c50af6747aaecff&action=click
>
Are those BS, too?
>
Of course...
Interesting. It did take a long time for scientists to
come around to the fact that rocks fell from the sky, but
those videos were recorded using some of the most advanced
equipment in existence, so it's much more credible than
peasants claiming they saw a rock falling.
“There may be millions of inhabited worlds circling other
suns, harboring beings who to us would seem godlike, with
civilizations and cultures beyond our wildest dreams.”
-- Arthur C. Clarke
>
Don't you think so?
>
"may be". IMHO it is very very unlikely.
IMHO, it's inevitable considering that the universe is at
least three times as old as our solar system. Add to that
the probability that huge hydrogen stars existed and went
supernova in a few thousand years, spreading heavy elements
out, and the fact that there are trillions of galaxies.
Early civilizations have had 12 billion years to develop,
which fits the bill for Clarke's claim.