Le piège parfait (the perfect trap)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : Le piège parfait (the perfect trap)
De : r.hachel (at) *nospam* wanadou.fr (Richard Hachel)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity fr.sci.physique
Suivi-à : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 16. Jul 2024, 14:38:25
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Nemoweb
Message-ID : <Bd8mOA-8nINExuba8PnEg4CG9rI@jntp>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : Nemo/0.999a
Le 16/07/2024 à 14:01, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit :
Den 15.07.2024 21:57, skrev Richard Hachel:

<http://news2.nemoweb.net/jntp?ch2jfWaArdOfK3yzPPitxq9HA-A@jntp/Data.Media:1>
 It is true according to SR. It inevitably follows from the metric:
  (c⋅dτ )² = (c⋅dt)² − dx² − dy² − dz²
 If you think otherwise, you better show where my math is wrong.
 I am not interested in your opinion.
 Ce n'est pas un comportement scientifique.
 J'ai expliqué depuis longtemps déjà que cette formule d'apparence logique et extraordinairement cohérente était fausse.  Le piège en est terrible.  C'est très joli, mais c'est faux.  Et cela conduit à des estimations de temps propres faux par défaut : les temps propres sont plus importants que ne le prédit cette formule faite correctement mais en milieu géométrique inexistant dans la nature réelle des choses.  La beauté et la cohérence des mathématiques (ici votre intégration parfaite) deviennent fausses et inutiles si on les applique à une physique abstraite de la réalité des choses.  J'encadre la dernière phrase. R.H. <http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=Bd8mOA-8nINExuba8PnEg4CG9rI@jntp>

Date Sujet#  Auteur
9 Jul 24 * Re: Langevin's paradox again161Thomas Heger
9 Jul 24 `* Re: Langevin's paradox again160Richard Hachel
9 Jul 24  +* Re: Langevin's paradox again6Maciej Wozniak
9 Jul 24  i`* Re: Langevin's paradox again5Python
9 Jul 24  i `* Re: Langevin's paradox again4Maciej Wozniak
9 Jul 24  i  `* Re: Langevin's paradox again3Python
9 Jul 24  i   `* Re: Langevin's paradox again2Maciej Wozniak
9 Jul 24  i    `- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Python
9 Jul 24  +* Re: Langevin's paradox again10Maciej Wozniak
9 Jul 24  i`* Re: Langevin's paradox again9Richard Hachel
10 Jul 24  i `* Re: Langevin's paradox again8Python
10 Jul 24  i  `* Re: Langevin's paradox again7Richard Hachel
10 Jul 24  i   `* Re: Langevin's paradox again6Python
10 Jul 24  i    +* Re: Langevin's paradox again4Python
10 Jul 24  i    i+* Re: Langevin's paradox again2Richard Hachel
11 Jul 24  i    ii`- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Python
10 Jul 24  i    i`- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Richard Hachel
10 Jul 24  i    `- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Richard Hachel
10 Jul 24  +* Re: Langevin's paradox again2Thomas Heger
10 Jul 24  i`- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Richard Hachel
10 Jul 24  `* Re: Langevin's paradox again141Paul.B.Andersen
10 Jul 24   +- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Richard Hachel
10 Jul 24   +- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Richard Hachel
11 Jul 24   `* Re: Langevin's paradox again138Richard Hachel
11 Jul 24    `* Re: Langevin's paradox again137Paul.B.Andersen
11 Jul 24     +- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Richard Hachel
11 Jul 24     +- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Richard Hachel
11 Jul 24     +- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Richard Hachel
11 Jul 24     +* Re: Langevin's paradox again29Richard Hachel
12 Jul 24     i+* Re: Langevin's paradox again22Paul.B.Andersen
12 Jul 24     ii+- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Maciej Wozniak
12 Jul 24     ii`* Re: Langevin's paradox again20Richard Hachel
14 Jul 24     ii `* Re: Langevin's paradox again19Paul.B.Andersen
14 Jul 24     ii  +- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Maciej Wozniak
14 Jul 24     ii  `* Re: Langevin's paradox again17Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24     ii   `* Re: Langevin's paradox again16Paul.B.Andersen
15 Jul 24     ii    +* Re: Langevin's paradox again14Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24     ii    i+- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Python
15 Jul 24     ii    i`* Re: Langevin's paradox again12Paul.B.Andersen
15 Jul 24     ii    i `* Re: Langevin's paradox again11Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24     ii    i  `* Re: Langevin's paradox again10Paul.B.Andersen
15 Jul 24     ii    i   `* Re: Langevin's paradox again9Richard Hachel
16 Jul 24     ii    i    `* Re: Langevin's paradox again8Paul.B.Andersen
16 Jul 24     ii    i     `* Re: Langevin's paradox again7Richard Hachel
16 Jul 24     ii    i      `* Re: Langevin's paradox again6Paul.B.Andersen
16 Jul 24     ii    i       +* Re: Langevin's paradox again4Richard Hachel
17 Jul 24     ii    i       i`* Re: Langevin's paradox again3Paul.B.Andersen
17 Jul 24     ii    i       i `* Re: Langevin's paradox again2Richard Hachel
17 Jul 24     ii    i       i  `- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Paul.B.Andersen
17 Jul 24     ii    i       `- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Stefan Ram
16 Jul 24     ii    `- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Haynh Molnár Jue
12 Jul 24     i`* Re: Langevin's paradox again6ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
12 Jul 24     i +* Re: Langevin's paradox again2Richard Hachel
12 Jul 24     i i`- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Maciej Wozniak
12 Jul 24     i +* Re: Langevin's paradox again2Richard Hachel
12 Jul 24     i i`- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Maciej Wozniak
12 Jul 24     i `- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Richard Hachel
11 Jul 24     `* Re: Langevin's paradox again104Stefan Ram
11 Jul 24      +* Re: Langevin's paradox again102Richard Hachel
11 Jul 24      i+- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Maciej Wozniak
11 Jul 24      i+- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Athel Cornish-Bowden
12 Jul 24      i+* Re: Langevin's paradox again8Mikko
12 Jul 24      ii`* Re: Langevin's paradox again7Athel Cornish-Bowden
14 Jul 24      ii +* Re: Langevin's paradox again4Mikko
14 Jul 24      ii i`* Re: Langevin's paradox again3Maciej Wozniak
14 Jul 24      ii i `* Re: Langevin's paradox again2Richard Hachel
14 Jul 24      ii i  `- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Finis Maryanna
14 Jul 24      ii `* Re: Langevin's paradox again2Richard Hachel
14 Jul 24      ii  `- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Athel Cornish-Bowden
12 Jul 24      i`* Re: Langevin's paradox again91Paul.B.Andersen
12 Jul 24      i +* Re: Langevin's paradox again83Richard Hachel
14 Jul 24      i i`* Re: Langevin's paradox again82Paul.B.Andersen
14 Jul 24      i i +* Re: Langevin's paradox again80Richard Hachel
14 Jul 24      i i i`* Re: Langevin's paradox again79Paul.B.Andersen
14 Jul 24      i i i +- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Conard Lèmmi
14 Jul 24      i i i +- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Richard Hachel
14 Jul 24      i i i +* Re: Langevin's paradox again5Richard Hachel
14 Jul 24      i i i i`* Re: Langevin's paradox again4Paul.B.Andersen
14 Jul 24      i i i i +- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Maciej Wozniak
14 Jul 24      i i i i +- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24      i i i i `- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Thomas Heger
14 Jul 24      i i i +- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Richard Hachel
14 Jul 24      i i i `* Re: Langevin's paradox again70Richard Hachel
14 Jul 24      i i i  `* Re: Langevin's paradox again69Paul.B.Andersen
14 Jul 24      i i i   `* Re: Langevin's paradox again68Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24      i i i    `* Re: Langevin's paradox again67Paul.B.Andersen
15 Jul 24      i i i     +* Re: Langevin's paradox again65Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24      i i i     i`* Re: Langevin's paradox again64Paul.B.Andersen
15 Jul 24      i i i     i +* Re: Langevin's paradox again36Richard Hachel
16 Jul 24      i i i     i i`* Re: Langevin's paradox again35Paul.B.Andersen
16 Jul 24      i i i     i i `* Re: Langevin's paradox again34Richard Hachel
16 Jul 24      i i i     i i  `* Re: Langevin's paradox again33Paul.B.Andersen
16 Jul 24      i i i     i i   +* Re: Langevin's paradox again20Richard Hachel
16 Jul 24      i i i     i i   i`* Re: Langevin's paradox again19Paul.B.Andersen
16 Jul 24      i i i     i i   i `* Re: Langevin's paradox again18Richard Hachel
17 Jul 24      i i i     i i   i  `* Re: Langevin's paradox again17Paul.B.Andersen
17 Jul 24      i i i     i i   i   `* Re: Langevin's paradox again16Richard Hachel
18 Jul 24      i i i     i i   i    `* Re: Langevin's paradox again15Paul.B.Andersen
18 Jul 24      i i i     i i   i     +* Re: Langevin's paradox again8Richard Hachel
19 Jul 24      i i i     i i   i     i`* Re: Langevin's paradox again7J. J. Lodder
19 Jul 24      i i i     i i   i     i `* Re: Langevin's paradox again6Richard Hachel
18 Jul 24      i i i     i i   i     `* Re: Langevin's paradox again6Jean-Michel Affoinez y Lopez-Francos
16 Jul 24      i i i     i i   `* Re: Langevin's paradox again12Python
15 Jul 24      i i i     i `* Re: Langevin's paradox again27Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24      i i i     `- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Richard Hachel
14 Jul 24      i i `- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Maciej Wozniak
12 Jul 24      i +- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Richard Hachel
12 Jul 24      i +* Re: Langevin's paradox again3Richard Hachel
12 Jul 24      i +- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Richard Hachel
12 Jul 24      i `* Re: Langevin's paradox again2Richard Hachel
11 Jul 24      `- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Maciej Wozniak

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal