Re: The Relativity Mafia

On 12/01/2024 01:33 PM, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:

On Fri, 29 Nov 2024 18:50:19 +0000, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>

On 11/29/2024 10:08 AM, Bertietaylor wrote:

On Fri, 29 Nov 2024 16:58:53 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
>

Bertie: I haven't connected with Arindam due to his claims about
ultimate realities. He probably thinks light is affected by gravity and
I don't.

>
You are right and Arindam will agree totally with you for he has proved
that gravity is an electrostatic phenomenon.
>
Bertietaylor

>
Heaviside and crew arrived at that action in the electrical field
was just a bit _beyond_ c, I suppose one might say, the "mass-less".

It seems we may be able to have energy without mass.

Well yeah, energy is just whatever is potential,
yet, there's no energy without entelechy.
That said, various derivations like when electromagnetism
arrives at an edge speed higher than c, in meters per second,
got no problems on their own after their own constructivistic
account.
A tetrad of quantities like mass/charge/lifetime/velocity,
about you'll notice four particles like neutron/electron/proton/photon,
about four forces like strong, electrical, weak, electroweak,
and four fields for those four forces,
and often in linear accounts a trio of the free one the fixed,
has that theories like GR have one or two of those, while QM
sort of billiard-balls them all together, then without
having another "element" like "ether", for space,
or a projection of prediction, for time,
have it so that a sort of tetra of quantities is
then arrived at as "energy", everywhere, connected,
"entelechy" everywhere, it's called "continuity law
a stronger than conservation law".
You can emulate the particle physicists and just put
"photons" everywhere doing whatever you say.
It's not considered very conscientious, ....