Re: XhatGPT; How many physicists accept GR?

On 11/15/2024 08:06 PM, rhertz wrote:

Do you want to learn how FANATICISM has even gained all the spaces of
AI? Read how far A IDIOTIC, INDOCTRINATED AI ENGINE is willing to go to
even include GR as foundational on any branch of physics, including
biophysics.
>
Also, BE AWARE about the intentions of relativists to SNATCH every
single theory, and mark it as (either) influenced by relativity or
directly derived from relativity.
>
Even in the way biological entities reactions are explained as to having
root in the mind of a fucking charlatan, 110 years ago.
>
This CULT, driven mainly by Jews during a century, is based on
supremacy, Jewish supremacy. And they have all the money, power and
means to make this possible. It started just after WWI, with strong
movements after WWII, when most of TPTB positions started to be owned by
the tribe.
>
Look at the world today, and THINK how does it work, except in few 3 or
4 eastern powers.
>
>
>
>
****************************************************
Name a consequence held in each of these sub-fields, not held in each of
the other sub-fields, held as a consequence of general relativity, and
what are truly the empirical opinions that define the sub-field
>
>
ChatGPT said:
>
General relativity has consequences that are unique to specific
subfields of physics. Here's a breakdown of distinctive consequences
associated with each subfield and their empirical focuses:
>
1. Cosmology
>
Consequence: The Expanding Universe
>
The prediction of an expanding universe arises from the application of
general relativity to large-scale spacetime, as modeled in solutions
like the Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) metric. This led to
the Big Bang theory.
>
The discovery of cosmic microwave background radiation (CMB) and
Hubble’s law supports this.
>
Empirical Opinions Defining Cosmology:
>
Observational evidence from redshifts of galaxies, CMB, and large-scale
structure studies.
>
Use of general relativity as a framework to interpret dark matter, dark
energy, and cosmic inflation.
>
2. Astrophysics
>
Consequence: Black Holes and Event Horizons
General relativity uniquely predicts the existence of black holes,
characterized by event horizons where spacetime curvature becomes
extreme. Observations like the Event Horizon Telescope's black hole
image confirm these predictions.
>
Empirical Opinions Defining Astrophysics:
Reliance on observational tools (telescopes, gravitational wave
detectors) to study phenomena like neutron stars, black holes, and
supernovae.
>
Trust in relativistic models to interpret compact objects and
high-energy processes.
>
3. High-Energy Physics/Particle Physics
Consequence: Relativistic Energy-Momentum Relationship
While not specific to general relativity, the relativistic
energy-momentum relationship is essential for understanding high-energy
particle collisions and behaviors.
>
Extensions of relativity, like curved spacetime quantum field theory,
influence particle behavior near strong gravitational fields.
>
Empirical Opinions Defining High-Energy Physics:
>
Confidence in relativistic quantum field theories to describe subatomic
particles and forces.
>
Testing extreme predictions of general relativity, like Hawking
radiation, at particle accelerators.
>
4. Quantum Physics
>
Consequence: Time Dilation and Gravitational Effects in Quantum Systems
General relativity predicts gravitational time dilation, now being
tested in quantum systems, such as entangled particles or matter-wave
interferometry experiments.
>
Empirical Opinions Defining Quantum Physics:
>
Ongoing efforts to reconcile relativity with quantum mechanics through
experiments and theories like quantum gravity.
>
Relativity serves as a boundary condition for quantum experiments in
curved spacetime.
>
5. Condensed Matter Physics
>
Consequence: Analogs of Curved Spacetime in Condensed Systems
Emergent phenomena in condensed matter systems, such as effective curved
spacetime in graphene or super fluid helium, mimic aspects of general
relativity.
>
Empirical Opinions Defining Condensed Matter Physics:
>
General relativity inspires models, but empirical focus is on material
properties, phase transitions, and emergent phenomena in low-energy
systems.
>
6. Biophysics and Medical Physics
>
Consequence: Relativistic Effects in Radiation Therapy
>
Gravitational time dilation is generally irrelevant in this field, but
relativistic mechanics influences how high-energy radiation interacts
with matter.
>
Empirical Opinions Defining Biophysics/Medical Physics:
Practical application of physical principles (e.g., radiotherapy) rather
than direct focus on relativistic effects.
>
Summary of Subfield-Defining Empirical Opinions
>
Cosmology: Observing the universe’s structure and interpreting it with
relativistic models.
Astrophysics: Studying high-energy celestial phenomena predicted by
relativity.
High-Energy Physics: Testing particle-level consequences of relativistic
theories.
Quantum Physics: Reconciling quantum mechanics with relativistic
principles.
Condensed Matter: Applying relativistic analogies to material behavior.
Biophysics/Medical Physics: Applying relativistic principles in
practical scenarios.
Each subfield adopts specific aspects of relativity as foundational
while focusing on distinct empirical phenomena relevant to its scope.
>
********************************
>
Worse yet: Imagine, at this pace, a world in just 3 or 4 years, when the
takeover be almost complete: You'll own nothing, you will be cashless,
you'll know nothing except the doctrines of the day, they will know
everything about you, AND YOU'LL BE HAPPY.

Ask it, or rather, tell it, to detail how the various interpretations
of these empirical sub-fields disagree with regards to their
interpretations of general relativity, which plainly is a theory
of absolutes and ideals, where, there's a negative stipulation
that "motion is relative".