Re: Newton: Photon falling from h meters increase its energy.

Le 13/01/2025 à 21:04, Python a écrit :

Le 13/01/2025 à 20:55, Richard Hachel  a écrit :

And a bunch of Usenet posts, for your more recent claims on accelerated travelers.

That's very kind of you.
It's quite rare to see you so kind, did you put honey in your Cognac?
Oh no, you're drinking Rum.
It would please the Gods if a man glorified his enemy by admitting that at least he doesn't cheat, and that what he says, he says of his own accord.
It remains to be demonstrated that everything I say is true.
So be it.
Now, you add: "I have already demonstrated to you, on numerous occasions, that there were errors in everything you say, notably in the proper times of accelerated objects, in the equality of certain proper times, in your apparent speeds, etc...etc...etc...."
Except that an improper term has been inserted in your sentence. You use the word "err". You say: "I have already demonstrated to you, on numerous occasions, that there were errors in..."
You are making a confusion (voluntary or involuntary) with the term "difference from what is taught".
I have often noticed that many people told me that I made mistakes, except that they called "theoretical discrepancies" errors.
These are not errors in the proper sense, neither mathematical (2+2=4 for everyone), nor theoretical (it is simply that the geometry used by Hachel is infinitely less grotesque than that of Minkowski, but that a follower of Minkowski reading Hachel will go crazy, and believe that it is Hachel who makes "errors".
These are not errors, it is simply a geometry that is more beautiful, more logical, less imprisoned in the straitjacket of the abstract and ridiculous Minkowskian block.
A true theory is a beautiful theory.
If a theory is not beautiful, it is because it is not true.
Je le répète, tu confonds "théorie fausse" et "théorie dissidente". R.H.