[SR] Why?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : [SR] Why?
De : r.hachel (at) *nospam* wanadou.fr (Richard Hachel)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 19. Jun 2024, 18:56:47
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Nemoweb
Message-ID : <LD4K6BjN8LU7EyULcWktoQOIq38@jntp>
User-Agent : Nemo/0.999a
One of the fundamental equations of the theory of relativity, To²=Tr²+Et², probably even one of the most beautiful in all of science, will however pose a small problem for a few months to the greatest theorist of our time: the doctor Richard Hachel.
A problem will appear to emerge in the development of uniformly accelerated frames of reference, because if we set x=(1/2.a.Tr²+Vr.Tr) it no longer works.
Now, if we look closely, reason makes us laugh.
My dear friends, do you understand WHY, in this specific case it does not work.
WHY? The answer is obvious if you correctly understand the theory of relativity. That is to say if anyone read me.
If you haven't read me, you can't understand. Whether we think we're the biggest name in RR or whether we're called Poincaré or Einstein.
Who can answer me (since some people have to read me and understand the SR in more depth).
R.H.
Date Sujet#  Auteur
19 Jun 24 * [SR] Why?13Richard Hachel
19 Jun 24 +* Re: [SR] Why?6gharnagel
19 Jun 24 i`* Re: [SR] Why?5Richard Hachel
20 Jun 24 i `* Re: [SR] Why?4gharnagel
20 Jun 24 i  `* Re: [SR] Why?3Richard Hachel
20 Jun 24 i   +- Re: [SR] Why?1gharnagel
20 Jun 24 i   `- Re: [SR] Why?1Maciej Wozniak
21 Jun 24 `* Re: [SR] Why?6Felierix Orbán Ping
21 Jun 24  `* Re: [SR] Why?5Richard Hachel
21 Jun 24   +* Re: [SR] Why?2gharnagel
22 Jun 24   i`- Re: [SR] Why?1Sordo Campana Peng
21 Jun 24   +- Re: [SR] Why?1T.J." Bogdán
21 Jun 24   `- Re: [SR] Why?1Wilkins Kalakos

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal