Re: Relativistic aberration

Le 01/08/2024 à 15:05, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

W dniu 01.08.2024 o 14:17, Python pisze:

And whatever you say - Poincare had enough wit
to understand how idiotic rejecting Euclid
would be, and he has written it clearly
enough for anyone able to read (even if not
clearly enough for you, poor stinker).

Stinker Python is having a lot of trouble with me at the moment. It can no longer follow the reality, clarity, logic and beauty of my equations and concepts, even though they are based on the initial Poincaré transformations.
It is completely enlisted in a crazy thing (the Minkowski space-time block) and it believes that the universe is made like that.
It uses, like all relativistic physicists, an interesting mathematical geometry, but ugly and false.
The problem is that once locked in this space-time block, the mind can no longer get out of it without considerable efforts of understanding, nor the idea that another geometric concept exists.
I have the same problem with Paul B. Andersen, who does not understand that the beauty and mathematical precision of his integration (perfect by the way) do not apply as it seems so obvious that they should, because the blue curve he follows is NOT the improper time, but only the instantaneous localization of each value of To (the line To which constantly remains a line throughout its entire path adjacent to the blue line).
But hey, I know Dr. Hachel is a real rogue, and no one has explained things as differently as he has.
So I understand that one can get upset by believing that one has an easy grip, and to constantly hit the void.
R.H.