Sujet : Re: Acceleration.
De : ross.a.finlayson (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Ross Finlayson)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativityDate : 16. Apr 2025, 17:19:00
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <O5-cnQGgP5IfRWL6nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@giganews.com>
References : 1
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
On 04/15/2025 01:32 PM, kinak wrote:
>
'Acceleration' might mean 'circular motion'
Well, the world is turning, and Archimedes and his lever
always must have a place to stand, so one may aver that
dynamics of any sort is always, "un-linear", and that only
in the abstract mental geometry is the, "linear",
that it may always be, "un-linear".
Einstein in one of his last books writes another derivation
of the mass-energy equivalency about the "centrally symmetric".
It's sort of called "Einstein's bridge", and what it does is
make it so that the dynamics is always, "un-linear", in the
abstract mental geometry of the, "linear".
Most people don't know it mostly since they're not taught it.
Yet, it's there.