Sujet : Re: Incorrect mathematical integration
De : r.hachel (at) *nospam* wanadou.fr (Richard Hachel)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativityDate : 21. Jul 2024, 21:45:36
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Nemoweb
Message-ID : <RUtzp877H6MkazkIIUrtPeuLIyo@jntp>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Nemo/0.999a
Le 21/07/2024 à 21:26, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit :
Den 20.07.2024 23:55, skrev Richard Hachel:
But you know of course that all clocks in the same time zone
are synchronous.
No, and I've kept telling you that.
Two stationary watches are not synchronous and never will be.
You are, once again, confusing anisochronia and dyschronotropia.
Two watches placed in two different places, stationary between them, obviously beat at the same speed.
It's logic.
This is certain, and the opposite would be absurd. Why would one beat faster than the other?
It's absurd.
So I say that they have the same chronotropy.
They measure time the same way.
BUT they are not synchronous. When one of them says "hello",
she notices that the other watch says "hello" a few nanoseconds later, and vice versa.
Physicists attribute this to the "speed of light". This is a colossal error and a misunderstanding of the nature of space and time. This is false. Information transactions are instantaneous, BUT out of sync in NATURE.
That’s what anisochrony is.
I repeat again, we must not confuse spatial anisochrony,
and internal chronotropy of watches, these are two different phenomena, but each one is just as real as the other.
R.H.