Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity
De : r.hachel (at) *nospam* liscati.fr.invalid (Richard Hachel)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 12. Oct 2024, 12:56:56
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Nemoweb
Message-ID : <UIdzdVLJ9_wb6WmCm-cvy4bha8g@jntp>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : Nemo/1.0
Le 12/10/2024 à 11:05, Mikko a écrit :
 
This is actually not true, because the world which SRT describes isn't the world we live in.
 A failed attempt is still an attempt. Therefore your "because" is wrong.
SR is an attempt to describe the world. Later it was found out that the
world is different but that does not affect what SR is.
 
SRT is about a world, where all thinfgs drift around in a dark and starless void,
 No, it is not. SR is about the geometry of the world, not about its matter
content except that the matter content must be compatible with the geometry.
SR is first and foremost an attempt to explain the Michelson-Morley experiment.
The calculation shows that, according to the experiment, w=v+c=c
Which is absurd.
We must therefore understand why it is absurd, and why it is at the same time true.
I have explained these things. These things represent the very basis of the whole theory, and they extend not only to Galilean frames of reference in uniform translations, but also to rotating frames of reference, and to uniformly accelerated frames of reference.
I have also explained the Langevin paradox, the Andromeda paradox, and the Ehrenfest paradox.
The solution that we have been struggling with since 1905 is incredibly simple, and it is very disconcerting to see that the human mind voluntarily, stubbornly, refuses to validate it.
Probably artificial intelligence will soon be able to come into play, and declare: "But what are you doing with your theory of relativity? Everything is dramatically obvious, how can you not understand how the nature of simultaneity works? How is it possible that for more than 120 years you have said everything backwards and in complete, COMPLETE confusion?"
Today's question, asked by Dr. Richard Hachel (Napoli Congress 2009):
Do you know the reason why this mathematical absurdity is nevertheless true?
W=v+c=c whatever v.
A seven-year-old child, informed by Hachel, will start laughing.
While the physicists, full of stupidity and arrogance, will drown.
"A seven-year-old child will lead them" says the Bible.
We must not spit on the prophecies of the ancients. They weren't that stupid.
R.H.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
1 Oct 24 * the notion of relativity of simultaneity71Richard Hachel
1 Oct 24 +* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity40Python
1 Oct 24 i+* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity36Thomas Heger
1 Oct 24 ii+- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Python
1 Oct 24 ii`* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity34Richard Hachel
1 Oct 24 ii `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity33Python
1 Oct 24 ii  +* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity2Richard Hachel
1 Oct 24 ii  i`- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Python
2 Oct 24 ii  `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity30Thomas Heger
2 Oct 24 ii   +* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity26Python
2 Oct 24 ii   i+* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity3Maciej Wozniak
2 Oct 24 ii   ii`* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity2Python
2 Oct 24 ii   ii `- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Maciej Wozniak
2 Oct 24 ii   i+- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Richard Hachel
3 Oct 24 ii   i`* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity21Thomas Heger
3 Oct 24 ii   i +* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity4Python
3 Oct 24 ii   i i`* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity3Richard Hachel
3 Oct 24 ii   i i `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity2Python
3 Oct 24 ii   i i  `- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Richard Hachel
3 Oct 24 ii   i +* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity5Richard Hachel
3 Oct 24 ii   i i+* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity2Python
3 Oct 24 ii   i ii`- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Richard Hachel
5 Oct 24 ii   i i`* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity2Thomas Heger
5 Oct 24 ii   i i `- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Richard Hachel
3 Oct 24 ii   i `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity11Richard Hachel
3 Oct 24 ii   i  +- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Python
5 Oct 24 ii   i  `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity9Thomas Heger
5 Oct 24 ii   i   `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity8Richard Hachel
6 Oct 24 ii   i    `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity7Thomas Heger
6 Oct 24 ii   i     +- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Richard Hachel
6 Oct 24 ii   i     `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity5Richard Hachel
8 Oct 24 ii   i      `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity4Thomas Heger
8 Oct 24 ii   i       `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity3Maciej Wozniak
11 Oct 24 ii   i        `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity2Thomas Heger
11 Oct 24 ii   i         `- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Richard Hachel
2 Oct 24 ii   `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity3Richard Hachel
3 Oct 24 ii    `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity2Thomas Heger
3 Oct 24 ii     `- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Richard Hachel
1 Oct 24 i`* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity3Richard Hachel
1 Oct 24 i +- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Python
2 Oct 24 i `- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Mikko
7 Oct 24 +* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity27JanPB
7 Oct 24 i`* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity26Richard Hachel
8 Oct 24 i +* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity2Python
8 Oct 24 i i`- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Richard Hachel
9 Oct 24 i `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity23Mikko
9 Oct 24 i  `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity22Richard Hachel
10 Oct 24 i   `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity21Mikko
10 Oct 24 i    `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity20Richard Hachel
11 Oct 24 i     `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity19Mikko
11 Oct 24 i      +- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Richard Hachel
12 Oct 24 i      `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity17Thomas Heger
12 Oct 24 i       `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity16Mikko
12 Oct 24 i        +- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Maciej Wozniak
12 Oct 24 i        `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity14Richard Hachel
12 Oct 24 i         +* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity9Python
12 Oct 24 i         i+* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity4Maciej Wozniak
12 Oct 24 i         ii`* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity3Python
12 Oct 24 i         ii `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity2Maciej Wozniak
12 Oct 24 i         ii  `- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Python
12 Oct 24 i         i`* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity4Richard Hachel
13 Oct 24 i         i `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity3Python
13 Oct 24 i         i  `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity2Maciej Wozniak
13 Oct 24 i         i   `- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Python
13 Oct 24 i         +* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity3Thomas Heger
13 Oct 24 i         i`* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity2Richard Hachel
14 Oct 24 i         i `- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Thomas Heger
13 Oct 24 i         `- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Mikko
14 Oct 24 `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity3Sylvia Else
14 Oct 24  +- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Richard Hachel
14 Oct 24  `- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Maciej Wozniak

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal