Sujet : Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix
De : ross.a.finlayson (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Ross Finlayson)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativityDate : 26. Sep 2024, 21:34:52
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <Xyqdnbvlx7n4WGj7nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
On 09/26/2024 04:23 AM, bertietaylor wrote:
On Tue, 17 Sep 2024 2:58:17 +0000, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>
Does anybody even bother to think about vis-viva versus vis-motrix
anymore, with regards to conservation, momentum, inertia, and energy,
and potential and impulse energy?
>
Is it usually considered at all that momentum and inertia change
places with respect to resistance to change of motion and rest
respectively sort of back and forth in the theory since antiquity?
>
Several times?
>
Check out Arindam's physics.
Discuss in detail if you dare.
And what does it say?
vis-viva and vis-motrix
Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix