Sujet : Re: Relativistic aberration
De : hitlong (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (gharnagel)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativityDate : 09. Aug 2024, 16:57:03
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <b3299149bb8d1febb9861d7962c99c99@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
On Fri, 9 Aug 2024 12:41:23 +0000, Richard Hachel wrote:
>
Le 09/08/2024 à 10:56, Python a écrit :
>
Because I've actually read Poincaré, Einstein, et al.
>
Gooood!
>
But don't forget two things.
1. Read Hachel too
2. When you have assimilated correctly (I mean correctly),
and Poincaré,
What I've read of him strikes me as a bit of a stuffed shirt.
and Einstein, and Minkowski,
Minkowski spacetime is an INTERPRETATION of SR. Einstein
was a bit put off by it, at least at first.
“spacetime is likely to be an approximate description of
something quite different.” – Steven Carlip
and Hachel,
Well, I've already pointed out where he has messed up.
don't forget to form your own personal and independent
opinion.
>
R.H.
Well ...
“People with opinions just go around bothering each
other.” -- Buddha
“All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal
more robust, sophisticated and well supported in logic
and argument than others.” -- Douglas Adams
"You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled
to your informed opinion. No one is entitled to be
ignorant." — Harlan Ellison
And an informed opinion means being informed by what
happens in reality, as well as what the mathematics
really means. My "opinions" have shifted a LOT over
the years because I continue to learn.
“Education isn’t something you can finish.”
– Isaac Asimov