Liste des Groupes | Revenir à p relativity |
Talking about idiocies in SI definitions of units by BIPM, what aboutIn case you didn't follow this:
the Kg of mass?
>
>
The old definition of the kilogram was based on the mass of the
International Prototype of the Kilogram (IPK), a platinum-iridium
cylinder kept at the BIPM. The IPK was sanctioned in 1889 by the 1st
General Conference on Weights and Measures (CGPM).
>
After 1960, the kilogram was the only SI unit still defined in terms of
a single manufactured object. So to ensure the accuracy of mass and
weight measurements, all the standard masses used in all the
measurements around the globe were, in theory, to be directly compared
to the IPK — which was kept by the International Bureau of Weights and
Measures (BIPM) in Sèvres, France.
>
Since May 20, 2019, the kilogram is now an ABSTRACT IDEA based on light
and energy, rather than a physical object. The new definition doesn't
need a physical reference block.
>
The kilogram, symbol kg, is the SI unit of mass. It is defined by taking
the fixed numerical value of the Planck constant h to be 6.62607015E−34
J⋅s, which is equal to kg⋅m^2/s, where the meter and the second are
defined in terms of c and ΔνCs.
>
It was the last physical object used to define the seven standard units
of the SI system, but it was susceptible to different perturbations like
changes in g, temperature, etc. Now, this reference is gone, after it
was found a difference of 54 micrograms (by 2005) with was previously
thought as a true 1.00000000 Kg of mass.
>
Now, everyone of the seven units of SI don't have any physical
representation. All of them are FIXED as theoretical values, even when
PHYSICS REALITY shows that they all ARE INCORRECT!
>
Yet, they have been ADOPTED, and any other secondary unit is derived
from THEORETICAL VALUES.
>
This is what science has become: a FUCKING JOKE (ON YOU).
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.