Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed

On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 9:18:48 +0000, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:

On 2024-10-16 08:48:34 +0000, Bertietaylor said:
>

On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 7:56:20 +0000, J. J. Lodder wrote:
>

Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> wrote:
>

On 2024-10-15 07:55:23 +0000, J. J. Lodder said:
>

Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> wrote:
>

On 2024-10-14 09:49:11 +0000, J. J. Lodder said:

>
Where is this work published (in a serious journal)?

>
Why bother about journals? Why not look at what has been done?

>
Nothing has been done until it has generated some peer approval,
or at least a tiny bit of peer interest,

>
Right. Let us suppose (a huge supposition, and almost certainly false)
that Arindam's inertia violation turns out to be correct. Will he get
credit for it? No, the discovery will be attributed in the textbooks to
the scientist who described and discussed it in a serious journal. The
best he can hope for is a footnote saying "Banerjee claimed some years
earlier in popular science sources that inertia violation could occur,
but he provided no verifiable evidence of the claim." I'm reminded of
Marie Mikhailovna Manasseïn: few people today have heard of her, and of
those few virtually none accept her claim to have discovered cell-free
fermentation 15 or so years before Eduard Buchner. OK, her results were
published in a serious journal (Ber. dt. Chem. Ges. (1872)), but her
experiments were unverifiable, and were very badly designed.

>
Yes, and Bucher even got a Nobel prize for it.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maria_Manaseina>

>
I had forgotten that Maria Manaseina had a Wikiparticle, and I was
surprised to see that I had edited it in March 2021, removing an
irrelevant reference inserted by someone determined to insert
references to himself in as many pages as possible.
>
Maybe Arindam could pay someone (not allowed, but not easy to
recognize) to write a Wikiparticle about himself. It's the closest
he'll ever get to fame.

>
Since he seems to have published nothing
(usenet and youtube don't count of course)

>
>
Arindam has published a few papers in conferences.

>
Conference papers are not usually refereed, for the sort of conferences
that I go to.

His conference papers are archived. The links are online. Yes the racist
European referees threw out his papers but Arindam had better luck with
Asians.

>
They relate to a range of subjects. From partial match retrieval to rail
guns to the hydrogen transmission network. On stripline circuits,
integrated IFF, and a design for MST radar antenna. He has worked for 30
years in Research and Development. He had a patent from Australia for
the HTN.
>
He is the greatest master of the English language as evident from all
his posts on Usenet.

>
Is he also a painter that would put Leonardo to shame?

He is a great photographer, much more efficient than da Vinci that way.
And his wife is more beautiful tham Mona Lisa. Arindam too is a stunner
with a magnificent voice. Well known on the Bengali stage and it is said
that his Sanskrit recitations such as the MahaChandiPaaTh are unmatched
with spine-tingling quality.

>
What about music? Is he a much better violinist than Yehudi Menuhin ever
was?

No. He cannot play any musical  instrument. However his lyrics surpass
the Beatles or anyone else. Just magnificent. We would have concerts in
his car, while driving down the Australian roads. What fun! What joy!
Arindam sang one of his songs in public to an ecstatic audience. But
never again, for his wife made him promise never to do that again. Cheap
popularity is not for Arindam.

>
As he is an unapologetic brown Hindu and a brahmin at that, he is
subjected to unrelenting oppression from all sides except his close
family and friends.
>
As he has the Divine on his side he cares not for the machinations of
the ungodly.
>
Woof-woof
>
Bertietaylor

>