Re: What is "local time"?

On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 5:54:50 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
W dniu 17.10.2024 o 06:07, gharnagel pisze:

>

That's only ONE definition.  Wozniak is a
poor observer because he refuses to see the
other one.  This one:
>
"Time is what keeps everything from happening at
once" -- Ray Cummings

>
I don't refuse to see something just
because it is some mystical bullshit
lacking any content.

>
So nature has no content

>
So the "definition" of yours has no content.

So Wozniak believes time is a human invention, and
that's its ONLY definition, yet trees grow, die
and decay.  He must believe that they didn't do
so before clocks were invented :-))

It may. Time remains  purely virtual abstract
invented by humans - for the purpose of
describing.

>
So Wozniak pretends he's living in a frozen universe.
Or he's just lying again.

>
No, I don't. Harnagel is just lying again.

I'm just trying to understand Wozniak's bizarre assertion
that time only exists because of human inventions.  I have
pointed out the insanity of that monumental absurdity, yet
Wozniak maintains his foolishness, apparently because he
can never admit it even when he is glaringly wrong.
“To hate being wrong is to change your opinion when you are
proven wrong; whereas pride, even when proven wrong, decides
to go on being wrong.” ― Criss Jami
"So the universe is not quite as you thought it was. You'd
better rearrange your beliefs, then. Because you certainly
can't rearrange the universe." – Isaac Asimov
Wozniak might be able to find some followers:
"There is no belief, however foolish, that will not gather
its faithful adherents who will defend it to the death."
-- Isaac Asimov
I suspect that Wozniak is the disproof of that quote since
NO ONE in the whole world believes anything he says.