Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: t-vx/c²

On Sat, 5 Oct 2024 13:23:15 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:

Den 05.10.2024 00:16, skrev rhertz:

<snip>

See:
https://paulba.no/paper/Electrodynamics.pdf
Read §3
  Theory of the Transformation of Co-ordinates and
  Times from a Stationary System to another System in
  Uniform Motion of Translation Relatively to the Former
>
You will NOT find the "change of variables" transform: (l set to 1)
  c²/(c²-v²) = β²         Lorentz equation (3)
  x' = βx, y'= y, z'= z   Lorentz equation (4)
  t' = t/β - βvx/c²       Lorentz equation (5)
>
Einstein never plagiarised Lorentz's "change of variables" transform.
>
and you will NOT find the Galilean transform:
x' = x - vt (or x = X - vt)
>
so when you said:
"In 1905, Einstein introduced (TRICK, out of the blue)
  x = X - vt, in order to get rid of ether."
you were LYING because you must know that it isn't true.
>

snip>
>
Sometimes your misinterpretation of the text you are reading
is hilarious! :-D

**************************************************************
LIAR + DECEIVER + FANATIC + IMBECILE <= Relativist Paul Anderson.
THE FIRST THING THAT EINSTEIN USED TO MAKE A FRAUDULENT PLAGIARISM
OF LORENTZ EQUATIONS WAS TO USE THE GALILEAN TRANSFORM x' = x - vt.
You, Paul, are beyond DISHONESTY! You are just A CROOK, either on
relativity or (I'm sure) ANYTHING ELSE YOU DID, DO AND WILL DO.
It's on your blood, fucking retarded!
READ THIS - READ THIS  - READ THIS - READ THIS - READ THIS
EINSTEIN USED GALILEAN TRANSFORM TO DERIVE LORENTZ WITHOUT ETHER!!
You are A DISGRACE OF A HUMAN BEING. I CEASE ANY CONTACT SINCE NOW.
PROOF IN THE 1905 PAPER.
QUOTE:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
§ 3. Theory of the Transformation of Co-ordinates and Times from a
Stationary System to another System in Uniform Motion of Translation
Relatively to the Former
............................................
Quoting 6th. paragraph (if you can count, beast!
............................................
If we place x' = x − vt, it is clear that a point at rest in the system
k must have a system of values x', y, z, independent of time. We first
define τ as a function of x', y, z, and t. To do this we have to express
in equations that τ is nothing else than the summary of the data of
clocks at rest in system k, which have been synchronized according to
the rule given in § 1.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
GOT THAT, IMBECILE IGNORANT?