Re: Space and spacetime

Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
W dniu 24.06.2024 o 13:45, gharnagel pisze:

>
Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
W dniu 23.06.2024 o 22:52, gharnagel pisze:

>
Maciej Wozniak recrudesced again:

>
See, trash - I've proven the moronic mumble
of your idiot guru to be not even consistent

>
Wozzie has never, ever done that.  He is exceedingly
dishonest and dangerously delusional.  All he has to
do is show his "proof" and it will be ripped to
shreds, and he knows it.  That's why he doesn't show
it.  He's so scared he's pooping his pants.
>
Python, call the nurse now!

>
Yes, I did.

 Blustering isn't a valid proof.  All Wozzie has to do is
show his "proof" again or give a link, but he won't do
that because he is lying again.
 

Pointed directly 2 denying itself predictions of the
physics of your idiot guru,

 All he has to do is SHOW it, but he can't because he
isn't competent.

>
Harrie, poor trash, I've shown it dosens of time
here, last time just some minutes before the
post you were answerring.

There's the record above which goes back to yesterday,
showing that Wozzie is lying again.  The record goes
back days and weeks amd months showing that Wozzie has
been lying for at least that long.

How likely is it that no reputable physicist or
mathematician has refuted or disproven relativity,
but a mathematically-challenged "information engineer"
who denies information has done so?

>
It's 100% likely, because it has happened.

No, it hasn't.  Wozzie is a congenital liar.  He can prove
he's not by posting a link to his "proof" but he won't
because it's nonexistent.

"Reputable" physicists, BTW? A good joke, Harrie.

"Reputable" "information engineer"?  A good joke, Wozzie.

And what's wrong in "information denying" when the
information is some absurd lie of a bunch of religious
maniacs?

What's wrong is that Wozzie is incompetent at deciding
what information is true and what is false.  Being a
mathematically-challenged non compos mentis means his
opinions are most untrustworthy.