Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity

Le 01/10/2024 à 14:54, Python a écrit :

Le 01/10/2024 à 14:36, Richard Hachel  a écrit :

Le 01/10/2024 à 08:52, Thomas Heger a écrit :

Am Dienstag000001, 01.10.2024 um 02:34 schrieb Python:

Le 01/10/2024 à 00:52, Richard "Hachel" Lengrnd a écrit :

One of the most fundamental problems in the history of humanity and the very basis of the notion of relativity of simultaneity: how to synchronize two watches so that they give the same time at the same present moment?
>
A little explanation would have been welcome.
>
Of course, in a Newtonian universe, it is not difficult.
>
But in a relativistic universe where each observer has his own hyperplane of present time?

 What do you mean by "hyperlane"?

 The set of all points, which could be connected to an events by a hypothetical signal with infinite velocity builds actually a three dimensional space.
 In RT-lingo, this is a hyperplane (of the present).
 Imagine you would 'flatten' space to a 2-dimensional sheet.
  TH
 

...

  Why do you answer him? You can see that he is crazy.
 He claims to be a great expert in relativity, but he is incapable of understanding what a simple "hyperplane" is.
 R.H.

 I do know what a hyperplane is :-) Neither Thomas nor you do :-)

LOL.
1. Tu dis que tu ne sais pas.
2. Puis tu dis que tu sais.
3. Puis tu fis que tu sais mieux.
Allez, montre ta force et décris les choses avec ta prose de grand critique scientifique.
Mais je te préviens, je ne suis infernal. Si c'est plus hugolien ou plus chateaubrianesque, je plagie. Si c'est débile, j'humilie.
Tes futurs avocats sont prévenus.
R.H. R.H.