Re: Perfect clocks

Mikko wrote:

>
On 2024-04-27 19:50:34 +0000, gharnagel said:

>
Perhaps there is only one nature, but it has many parts.
The discussion seems to be about the part of nature called
"time" ...

>
Time is not a part of nature. If you remove time and everthing
that is in a time or is a part of time or is a property of time
or requires time to exist then nothing is left.

But isn't nature dynamic?  Seasons change, animals live and die,
the earth gets older, stars evolve.  These require the concept of
time.

but what is "time"?

>
Many things are called "time". Without a disambiguating context
"time" is not a concept but a topic.

Isn't time both a concept AND a topic?  I suppose the same can be
said about nature.  So what?  How has that furthered the discussion?
Wozzie lies about time by doing the opposite of disambiguating:
he obfuscates, he muddles, he reads a clock located elsewhere and
pretends it would read the same if he were right beside it.