Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of the mumble of your idiot guru

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of the mumble of your idiot guru
De : hitlong (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (gharnagel)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 10. Nov 2024, 15:16:30
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <d43a51f0643b765b3dd2bb040077359b@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 8:38:38 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>
W dniu 10.11.2024 o 04:30, gharnagel pisze:
>
On Sat, 9 Nov 2024 16:27:28 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>
If I called you a pedophile murderer - under
the guise of your relativistic idiocies -
what woould you say, poor, lying piece of shit?
>
Pshaw!  Wozniak just cuts and pastes his old
worn-out straw-man polemic, even retaining the
same typo :-))  Yawn!
>
As for his beyond stupid "relativistic idiocies"
baloney:
>
Both special and general relativity have been confirmed
>
Only such an idiot as you are can believe
such a nonsensical lie.
Wozniak will not even read the entire sentence before he
makes a response.

Both special and general relativity have been confirmed
by copious experimental evidence, so Wozniak's belief
system is wildly unrealistic, even delusional.
He also refuses to read the copious evidence:
https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/experiments.html
He can't do the math involved in confirming the postulates of
relativity, so he calls people idiots who actually read and
understand the evidence.  All he does is prove that he is the
one who "slanders" and insults.  It's called hypocrisy.
“‎When you point your finger at someone, anyone, it is often a
moment of judgement. We point our fingers when we want to scold
someone, point out what they have done wrong. But each time we
point, we simultaneously point three fingers back at ourselves.”
 – Christopher Pike

After deleting GPS clocks from the reality, of course.
No such thing.  Wozniak's "short proof of the inconsistency"
of relativity is illogical nonsense.  He conflates human
definitions with natural processes to falsely demean
relativity.  And he refuses to accept REAL information:
"At the time of launch of the first NTS-2 satellite (June 1977),
which contained the first Cesium clock to be placed in orbit,
there were some who doubted that relativistic effects were real.
A frequency synthesizer was built into the satellite clock system
so that after launch, if in fact the rate of the clock in its
final orbit was that predicted by GR, then the synthesizer could
be turned on bringing the clock to the coordinate rate necessary
for operation. The atomic clock was first operated for about 20
days to measure its clock rate before turning on the synthesizer.
The frequency measured during that interval was +442.5 parts in
10^12 faster than clocks on the ground; if left uncorrected this
would have resulted in timing errors of about 38,000 nanoseconds
per day." -- Neil Ashby
http://www.leapsecond.com/history/Ashby-Relativity.htm
Being an "information engineer" is insufficient to criticize
relativity:
“Information is not knowledge.” -- Albert Einstein
And knowledge is also insufficient:
"Any fool can know.  The point is to understand." ―Albert Einstein

Date Sujet#  Auteur
8 Nov 24 * Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of the mumble of your idiot guru13gharnagel
8 Nov 24 `* Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of the mumble of your idiot guru12gharnagel
8 Nov 24  `* Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of the mumble of your idiot guru11Maciej Wozniak
9 Nov 24   `* Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of the mumble of your idiot guru10gharnagel
9 Nov 24    `* Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of the mumble of your idiot guru9gharnagel
9 Nov 24     `* Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of the mumble of your idiot guru8Maciej Wozniak
10 Nov 24      `* Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of the mumble of your idiot guru7gharnagel
10 Nov 24       `* Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of the mumble of your idiot guru6Maciej Wozniak
10 Nov 24        `* Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of the mumble of your idiot guru5gharnagel
10 Nov 24         `* Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of the mumble of your idiot guru4Maciej Wozniak
11 Nov 24          `* Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of the mumble of your idiot guru3gharnagel
11 Nov 24           `* Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of the mumble of your idiot guru2Maciej Wozniak
11 Nov 24            `- Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of the mumble of your idiot guru1gharnagel

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal