Re: A typical conversation with a relativistic idiot

On Mon, 7 Oct 2024 7:23:56 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

W dniu 07.10.2024 o 03:44, rhertz pisze:

On Sun, 6 Oct 2024 10:26:25 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>

- It's not just me and my idiot guru saying!
It's MUONS!!! And EXPERIMENTS!!!  And  the
overwhelming majority saying!!!!!
>
- but experiments can't speak and the
overwhelming majority is not even aware
of your idiocies...
>
- UUUU!!!  UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU!!!! UUUUUUUUUU!!!!
PLONK!!!!!
>
It was Jim Penino, a really poor halfbrain,
but could be any of you as well. You imagine
you're the elite of rational thinkers. Well,
you're mistaken.

>
Ask the ignorant of Paul Anderson about the Mount Wilson muon's

>
Poor fanatic has stopped to answer my questions
years ago. But, anyway, their precious experiments
are not especially interesting for me. I'm rather
interested in their "logic", allowing them to
believe that those experiments are supporting
somehow not even consistent babble of their
idiot guru.

Read my last post about local time.
The imbecile PRETENDED to teach me about how GALILEO'S TRANSFORM IS NOT
THE BASIS of the fraudulent derivation of the Lorentz transforms.
I HAD TO MAKE A DRAWING INCLUDING EVERY RELEVANT TEXT OF THE POINT 3,
WHERE THE SLICKY VIPER (EINSTEIN) USED MANY RETORTED WORDS TO HIDE THE
FACT THAT x' = x-vt IS ESSENTIAL FOR HIS MATHEMATICAL DERIVATION.
Regarding his last post, and his idiot interpretations, IT IS A SAMPLE
of the behavior of a liar, deceiver, fraudulent and IMBECILE relativist.
Paul prefers to DIE LYING AND DISTORTING FACTS before REASON A BIT.
I've cut any interaction with that cretin since today.
My post, with the drawing (retarded-proof) is my last attempt with this
asshole.