Re: What is "local time"?

On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 20:05:27 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
W dniu 16.10.2024 o 21:43, gharnagel pisze:

>
On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 13:34:57 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
As usual, Harrie spits.

>
Says the congenital liar :-))
>

And say nonsense about things he admits he
doesn't know much about.

>
which Wozniak knows nothing about, which is why
he keeps conflating two different things.
>

Well, it's not usual that he admits.

>
I don't know much, but I'm always observing.

>
Right, you don't know much. Typical
with a brainwashed fanatic idiot.

“I'm smart enough to know that I'm dumb.”
 -- Richard P. Feynman
Wozniak isn't even THAT smart.

Oh, there is a wide variety of things
that change in nature. Time, however,
is not any of them. There is no time
in nature.

>
Wozniak is likely to get hit by a falling
rock; that is, one that is changing its
position in space as a function of time
passing.

Wozniak isn't even smart enough to observe
that time passes.

It's a purely virtual abstract invented
by humans - for the purpose of describing.
Describing nature and other things.

>
That's only ONE definition.  Wozniak is a
poor observer because he refuses to see the
other one.  This one:
>
"Time is what keeps everything from happening at
once" -- Ray Cummings

>
I don't refuse to see something just
because it is some mystical bullshit
lacking any content.

So nature has no content because time doesn't
pass.  Obviously, Wozniak the congenital liar
is lying again.

This is the one as real as a punch in the face.
The punch may come from a person (who is also a
part of nature), or it may come from a falling
rock.

>
It may. Time remains  purely virtual abstract
invented by humans - for the purpose of
describing.

So Wozniak pretends he's living in a frozen universe.
Or he's just lying again.

Time is almost always present in  any
description of anything.  That's why
it appears for weak minds to be something
real.

>
Wozniak has a weak mind because he can't
understand that there are two kinds of
"time": the real one in nature and our
attempts to describe it (with clocks and
coordinates).

>
An assertion of an ignorant idiot mystician
means nothing.

A dishonest assertion by a congenital liar
means nothing.

Clocks are clocks, theories are theories.
Time is obviously not any of them.

>
Agreed.  Time is a part of nature; it's neither
clocks nor theories.

>
Nope.
Time is a coordinate. Neuther a clock, nor
a theory, and has nothing in common with the
nature.

Repeating half-truths doesn't make them whole
truths.  Half-truths are lies, which is what
Wozniak always does.  And he doubles down
when his false assertions are exposed.
“To hate being wrong is to change your opinion when you are
proven wrong; whereas pride, even when proven wrong, decides
to go on being wrong.” ― Criss Jami
“How often it is that the angry man rages denial of what his inner
self is telling him.” – Frank Herbert
Or, perhaps, maybe Wozniak doesn't have an inner self?
“Denial is the worst kind of lie … because it is the lie you tell
yourself.” – Michelle A. Homme
That seems to be where Wozniak is.