Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of the mumble of your idiot guru

On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 6:18:35 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
W dniu 08.11.2024 o 00:57, gharnagel pisze:

>
On Thu, 7 Nov 2024 21:36:50 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second
As seen, the definition of second loved so
much to be invoked by relativistic morons -
wasn't valid in the time when their idiot guru
lived and mumbled. Up to 1960 it was ordinary
1/86400 of a solar day, also in physics.
>
>
Now: an observer moving with c/2 wrt
solar system is measuring the length
of solar day. What is the result predicted
by the Einsteinian physics?
One prediction is - 99766. From the
postulates. The second prediction is -
86400. From definition.
And similiarly with the prediction of
a measurement of a meridian.
>
>
Thank you for your attention, poor
relativistic fanatics, have a nice day.

>
Cutting and pasting this nonsense indicates
some kind of obsession, perhaps OCD.

>
Raving, spitting and slandering won't help
anything,

That's right, neither will obsessively reposting
it.  So why does Wozniak keep raving, spitting,
"slandering" and reposting this refuted nonsense?

the mumble of your idiot guru

Wozniak is the only one "slandering" here, as he
spits and raves and snarls his insults.

remains not even consistent.

Wozniak is completely unaware that his argument
is ... inconsistent.  He even deleted a cogent
rebuttal rather than refute it because it's
irrefutable.
If the postulates that derive the Lorentz transform
equations are correct in a domain of applicability,
then the LTEs are correct in that domain.  If the
LTEs are correct, then their conclusions are also
correct, like the relativity of simultaneity, and no
duplicitous jibber jabber can refute it.  Wozniak
fails Logic 101.
the skills he needs to produce a right answer are
exactly the skills he doesn't have to recognize
what a right answer is. (D-K effect).