Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,

On Wed, 18 Sep 2024 2:30:18 +0000, rhertz wrote:

http://www.leapsecond.com/museum/HK50/1971-PTTI-Vol-03_17.pdf

The above had been written BEFORE their full analysis using the
method of correlated rate-change analysis, which I described earlier.
So yes, the initial analysis did not look all that great, but the
full analysis making use of all of the inter-comparison data was
able to resolve the clock glitches.
Nowadays, cesium clocks have far greater stability, and convincing
results can be obtained using single clocks on short flights
and WITHOUT any sophisticated data analysis.
http://resource.npl.co.uk/docs/publications/newsletters/metromnia/issue18_einstein.pdf
Why do you keep attempting to knock down the H&K experiment?