Re: No evidence

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : Re: No evidence
De : hitlong (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (gharnagel)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 15. Sep 2024, 01:06:30
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <f3c235167847a5acfb6ebb850598aad1@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
On Sat, 14 Sep 2024 23:06:47 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
>
Mikko: How can we know the different rates of atomic clocks in space are
due to gravity when there are numerous differences in that environment
from Earth?
(1) The satellite clocks are isolated from environmental conditions with
the exception of relative velocity and gravitational field.
(2)
https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2010/09/nist-pair-aluminum-atomic-clocks-reveal-einsteins-relativity-personal-scale
NIST scientists performed the new "time dilation" experiments by
comparing operations of a pair of the world's best experimental
atomic clocks. The nearly identical clocks are each based on the
"ticking" of a single aluminum ion (electrically charged atom)
as it vibrates between two energy levels over a million billion
times per second.
In one set of experiments, scientists raised one of the clocks
by jacking up the laser table to a height one-third of a meter
(about a foot) above the second clock. Sure enough, the higher
clock ran at a slightly faster rate than the lower clock,
exactly as predicted.
The second set of experiments examined the effects of altering
the physical motion of the ion in one clock. (The ions are almost
completely motionless during normal clock operations.) NIST
scientists tweaked the one ion so that it gyrated back and forth
at speeds equivalent to several meters per second. That clock
ticked at a slightly slower rate than the second clock, as
predicted by relativity.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
13 Sep 24 * Re: No evidence39LaurenceClarkCrossen
13 Sep 24 +* Re: No evidence2gharnagel
14 Sep 24 i`- Re: No evidence1LaurenceClarkCrossen
14 Sep 24 `* Re: No evidence36Mikko
15 Sep 24  +* Re: No evidence5LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Sep 24  i+- Re: No evidence1LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Sep 24  i`* Re: No evidence3Mikko
15 Sep 24  i +- Re: No evidence1Maciej Wozniak
15 Sep 24  i `- Re: No evidence1LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Sep 24  `* Re: No evidence30LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Sep 24   +* Re: No evidence11gharnagel
15 Sep 24   i+* Re: No evidence9LaurenceClarkCrossen
16 Sep 24   ii`* Re: No evidence8gharnagel
16 Sep 24   ii +- Re: No evidence (rotating frames)1Ross Finlayson
16 Sep 24   ii `* Re: No evidence6gharnagel
18 Sep 24   ii  `* Re: No evidence5gharnagel
18 Sep 24   ii   `* Re: No evidence4gharnagel
18 Sep 24   ii    `* Re: No evidence3gharnagel
20 Sep 24   ii     `* Re: No evidence2gharnagel
20 Sep 24   ii      `- Re: No evidence1Maciej Wozniak
16 Sep 24   i`- Re: No evidence1gharnagel
15 Sep 24   `* Re: No evidence18Mikko
15 Sep 24    +- Re: No evidence1Maciej Wozniak
15 Sep 24    +* Re: No evidence4LaurenceClarkCrossen
17 Sep 24    i`* Re: No evidence3Mikko
17 Sep 24    i +- Re: No evidence1LaurenceClarkCrossen
20 Sep 24    i `- Re: No evidence1Thomas Heger
15 Sep 24    +* Re: No evidence5LaurenceClarkCrossen
17 Sep 24    i`* Re: No evidence4Mikko
17 Sep 24    i `* Re: No evidence3Richard Hachel
19 Sep 24    i  `* Re: No evidence2Mikko
19 Sep 24    i   `- Re: No evidence1Richard Hachel
15 Sep 24    `* Re: No evidence7LaurenceClarkCrossen
16 Sep 24     +- Re: No evidence1gharnagel
16 Sep 24     +- Re: No evidence1LaurenceClarkCrossen
17 Sep 24     `* Re: No evidence4Mikko
17 Sep 24      `* Re: No evidence3LaurenceClarkCrossen
19 Sep 24       `* Re: No evidence2Mikko
19 Sep 24        `- Re: No evidence1Maciej Wozniak

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal