Sujet : Re: Relativistic aberration
De : r.hachel (at) *nospam* jesauspu.fr (Richard Hachel)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativityDate : 08. Aug 2024, 15:38:51
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Nemoweb
Message-ID : <h4F5sdve1wE6ne0ImBpJ4wq2bnE@jntp>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Nemo/0.999a
Le 08/08/2024 à 13:17, Python a écrit :
This euclidean space is kind of projection into the realm of the local observer, who 'cuts' spacetime into time and space, simply by being somewhere.
This is not true.
In any case, that would be wrong.
It's rather Minkowski who thinks like that.
He creates a sort of four-dimensional concrete block,
and he seems to think that, depending on how you cut it, you share a part of the cake.
It's stupid.
That's not at all what our universe is.
A vision without space or time, absolute, in four elastic dimensions according to position and speed is much more judicious than a concrete block that you share in slices.
This last vision also gives false results in the end, and as soon as you complicate things.
R.H.