Re: No true relativist!

On 11/09/2024 04:27 AM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:

Den 09.11.2024 05:43, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:

No true space is flat according to relativity.
>

>
No water surface is flat according to Newton.
>

According to Poincare, there's a notion of the
plane, that is rough, instead of smooth, that
the Euclidean smooth plane and Poincare rough plane,
make for that the notions like the zollfrei metric,
or any other sort "continuous manifold" makes it
so that the many-fold, surface, makes for that
the plain geometry the plane geometry is as well
a continuous: manifold, as then usually in the
theory is according to a space-time a Space-Time
the vector fields associated with the space field
their contents with as well the contradistinction
and juxtaposition the Euclidean smooth plane,
and Poincare rough plane.
In mathematics then this is usually with regards
to the "continuous and differentiable", with regards
to the non-differentiable, everywhere, which makes
for a reasoning that of course the Laplacian that
most usual reasoning about the quadratic and partials,
and also harmonic theory with regards to Chladni functions,
that the Laplacians are at best partial, and that the
analysis situs makes for that both the integral analysis
and the differential analysis are required for a
better mathematics what may suffice.
The meniscus and the difference in fluid models
between skin effect of electricity and core effect
of liquids, has that water is merely an extreme
of sorts among properties of liquids their surface
tensions, and that of course some liquids have
no meniscus and are thusly of course flat.