Re: Relativistic synchronisation method

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : Re: Relativistic synchronisation method
De : r.hachel (at) *nospam* liscati.fr.invalid (Richard Hachel)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 16. Dec 2024, 16:36:47
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Nemoweb
Message-ID : <kQ0LSPYPi-eXWvUX1l430FGQz6g@jntp>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Nemo/1.0
Le 16/12/2024 à 15:59, Sylvia Else a écrit :
Einstein defined the the word precisely, in the sense in which he used it in his analysis. Since it is a definition, it needs only be applied.
 As it happens, his definition is very easy to understand, though nothing turns on that.
 Sylvia.
Einstein does not define anything at all. For the speed of light, Einstein postulates that it is invariant, but he does not explain WHY.
Hachel explains it.
The whole world is then taken with fear in front of such intelligence, and is afraid that Hachel, blessed be He, may the peace of Aôôôllah be upon him, is considered a luminary in the power of thought.
What a bunch of idiots men are!
Einstein postulates that to synchronize two watches, it is enough to send them a signal. LOL.
Hachel, blessed be He, peace be upon him, may he taste the paradise of Aôôôllah in the company of 72 eternal virgins, explains that watches are all insynchronizable, that they can never be synchronized, because it is the nature of space-time to be "like that".
He explains that this interesting but abstract synchronization consists in synchronizing on a point M outside our three-dimensional space, and placed virtually at an equal distance from all the points composing a given frame of reference.
Hachel, peace be upon him, may Aôôôllah invite him to taste his paradise and his 72 houris for intense sexual pleasures, is rewriting the theory of relativity by taking up its bases and explanations, to give a simpler and clearer vision, freed from all paradoxes and errors (the way scientists teach accelerated and rotating frames of reference is truly shameful).
No, no, no, we must not say that Eisntein defines things well.
Not only is it false, but it also prevents us from looking further and discovering another truth.
Il you can read french text without hatred and with interest, I explain the things here : <http://nemoweb.net/jntp?kQ0LSPYPi-eXWvUX1l430FGQz6g@jntp/Data.Media:1>
R.H. --
Ce message a été posté avec Nemo : <https://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=kQ0LSPYPi-eXWvUX1l430FGQz6g@jntp>

Date Sujet#  Auteur
16 Dec13:22 * Relativistic synchronisation method44Richard Hachel
16 Dec15:59 +* Re: Relativistic synchronisation method39Sylvia Else
16 Dec16:25 i+* Re: Relativistic synchronisation method19Maciej Wozniak
16 Dec17:06 ii`* Re: Relativistic synchronisation method18Richard Hachel
16 Dec17:43 ii +* Re: Relativistic synchronisation method4Maciej Wozniak
16 Dec18:02 ii i`* Re: Relativistic synchronisation method3Richard Hachel
16 Dec19:51 ii i `* Re: Relativistic synchronisation method2Maciej Wozniak
17 Dec00:25 ii i  `- Re: Relativistic synchronisation method1Richard Hachel
17 Dec14:51 ii `* Re: Relativistic synchronisation method13Paul.B.Andersen
17 Dec15:31 ii  +* Re: Relativistic synchronisation method11Richard Hachel
21 Dec15:22 ii  i`* Re: Relativistic synchronisation method10Paul.B.Andersen
21 Dec18:26 ii  i `* Re: Relativistic synchronisation method9Richard Hachel
22 Dec14:02 ii  i  `* Re: Relativistic synchronisation method8Paul.B.Andersen
22 Dec14:35 ii  i   `* Re: Relativistic synchronisation method7Richard Hachel
22 Dec20:58 ii  i    `* Re: Relativistic synchronisation method6Paul.B.Andersen
22 Dec21:25 ii  i     +- Re: Relativistic synchronisation method1Maciej Wozniak
22 Dec21:26 ii  i     +- Re: Relativistic synchronisation method1Ross Finlayson
22 Dec21:31 ii  i     +- Re: Relativistic synchronisation method1Ross Finlayson
22 Dec22:15 ii  i     `* Re: Relativistic synchronisation method2Richard Hachel
22 Dec22:31 ii  i      `- Re: Relativistic synchronisation method1Ross Finlayson
17 Dec15:52 ii  `- Re: Relativistic synchronisation method1Richard Hachel
16 Dec16:36 i`* Re: Relativistic synchronisation method19Richard Hachel
16 Dec17:41 i +- Re: Relativistic synchronisation method1Maciej Wozniak
17 Dec05:33 i `* Re: Relativistic synchronisation method17Sylvia Else
17 Dec11:45 i  `* Re: Relativistic synchronisation method16Richard Hachel
17 Dec12:24 i   +- Re: Relativistic synchronisation method1Maciej Wozniak
17 Dec17:42 i   `* Re: Relativistic synchronisation method14Python
17 Dec18:19 i    `* Re: Relativistic synchronisation method13Richard Hachel
17 Dec18:32 i     `* Re: Relativistic synchronisation method12Python
17 Dec18:50 i      +* Re: Relativistic synchronisation method6Richard Hachel
17 Dec18:57 i      i+* Re: Relativistic synchronisation method4Python
17 Dec19:14 i      ii`* Re: Relativistic synchronisation method3Richard Hachel
17 Dec19:15 i      ii +- Re: Relativistic synchronisation method1Python
17 Dec21:47 i      ii `- Re: Relativistic synchronisation method1shades@cov.net.inv
17 Dec19:02 i      i`- Re: Relativistic synchronisation method1Python
17 Dec18:58 i      +* Re: Relativistic synchronisation method2Richard Hachel
17 Dec19:40 i      i`- Re: Relativistic synchronisation method1Python
17 Dec19:01 i      +* Re: Relativistic synchronisation method2Richard Hachel
17 Dec19:05 i      i`- Re: Relativistic synchronisation method1Python
18 Dec17:43 i      `- Re: Relativistic synchronisation method1Richard Hachel
17 Dec14:30 `* Re: Relativistic synchronisation method4Mikko
17 Dec15:16  `* Re: Relativistic synchronisation method3Richard Hachel
19 Dec11:52   `* Re: Relativistic synchronisation method2Mikko
19 Dec12:34    `- Re: Relativistic synchronisation method1Richard Hachel

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal