Re: The most ridiculous science mistake in history.

Le 04/04/2024 à 21:58, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

W dniu 04.04.2024 o 20:46, Python pisze:

Le 04/04/2024 à 15:01, Athel Cornish-Bowden a écrit :

On 2024-04-04 10:32:14 +0000, Richard Hachel said:
>

Le 04/04/2024 à 11:33, Athel Cornish-Bowden a écrit :

And yours? The other day you criticized me for referring to "Dr" Hachel's most obvious lies rather than addressing his statements about physics. If I know he's lying about he claims to have seen on television, why should I believe what he says about physics?
>
Two questions for "Dr" Hachel:
>
1. When are you going to produce evidence of your claimed doctorate? Until you do I shall continue regard it as something you got from a degree mill, or something you just invented. In other words a lie.
>
2. Which television channels to you watch for your news? We don't get FoxNews in France (or only with difficulty), so it's not that. I regularly watch the news on TF1, BFM-TV, LCI, LCP, and occasionally France 2. (Why so many? Because my wife just loves these channels.) None of them has ever broadcast anything like the lies you pretended.
>
athel -- biochemist, not a physicist, but detector of crackpots

>
You are right, your wife (you will offer her my deep respect for her television curiosity) watches TF1, LCI and BFM-TV.
But you should advise her and tell her, to help her, what Dr. Hachel would suggest to her: to also watch a few channels other than these pro-Bideniste and ultra-Macronist channels.
There is a channel that I like, because it gets to the bottom of things, it is CNews, whose audiences in France are only growing (this is why the French government wants to close it).

>
OK, I forgot CNews. Although rather right-wing it has some good journalists, like Charlotte d'Ornelas. I don't agree wth all says, but she says it very well.

 No surprise M.D. Lengrand (aka Hachel) loves C-News, a channel which almost

 Oh, stinker Python is opening its muzzle again,
and trying again to pretend he knows something.
Tell me, poor stinker, have you already learnt
what a function is? Or are you still trying
to determine its properties applying a French
definition of a different word?

What different word? How an idiot you are, Maciej...
Are you more stupid than stubborn, Maciej, or the other way around?
Fact is that in the French academia "functions" are usually defined
over a set that is not necessarily restricted to their domains.
For instance f: x->1/x is usually said to be a function from R
to R (not R* to R) even if f(0) does not exist.
This is only a matter of convention that does not really matter
at the end of day. Only idiots of your kinds lost their minds
on such insignificant details.
If you could read French and had any kind of integrity, you would
have got the point in the  documents I pointed out to you. But
you haven't, have you?