Re: Langevin's paradox again

Le 12/07/2024 à 17:27, tomyee3@gmail.com (ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog) a écrit :

 

What we must understand when we want to study the theory of relativity correctly, and not simply to talk about it, to show that we are a man, and that we have a large penis (the human guilty sin that man himself never wants to admit and that he represses on others), is that the notion of universal present DOES NOT EXIST.
Now, when I read you, I have the impression that you believe in it like others believe in the Blessed Virgin or in the harem-paradise where we can take around twenty chicks a day.
But no, that's not how it happens.
You say "at time one an event A occurs in A, there is an inctant present in B which considers that A has just occurred at the moment; and vice versa."
It's stupid.
And to think like that, that is to say that there exists in the universe a plane of absolute present time, is to show that we have understood nothing, nothing at all about the theory of relativity.
Don't laugh, friends, a man like Stephen Hawking, who was presented as a great man, also believed in such nonsense.
R.H.