Liste des Groupes | Revenir à p relativity |
I have already written, that this is a certain perspective of writing.You cannot pretend to be a professor, even hypothetical, when dealing>>>>It is. It is explained in my initial post : What is (AB)/c to you?>
AB was actually meant as:
>
distance from A to B,
>
even if A and B are in fact position vectors, hence AB would usually be the scalar product of A and B (what is absurd).
Yes it would be absurd. BTW you are conflating affine spaces with
vector spaces here.
>Besides of this little formal issue (actually meant was |r_AB| ),>
Well, Thomas, this is utterly ridiculous. Any reader understands what
AB as it appears in 2AB/(t'_A - t_A) is the distance AB. From high
school to Ph. D.
"the distance AB" is not equal to "AB"!
The distance between A and B can be denoted in a lot of ways. The point
is to ensure that there is no ambiguity given the context. As a matter
of fact Einstein in the ORIGINAL paper used an overbar on top of
AB (https://myweb.rz.uni-augsburg.de/~eckern/adp/history/einstein-papers/1905_17_891-921.pdf)
>
So if there were someone to blame here, it would be the translator.
>
>
I wrote annotations from a certain perspective:
>
I treated the text in question as homework of a student and myself as hypothetical professor, who had to write corrections for that paper.
with subject you are both ignorant of and too stupid to understand.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.