Re: ww3

Am Donnerstag000016, 16.01.2025 um 09:25 schrieb Bertietaylor:
...

Napoleon ranks with Alexander, Caesar and Hitler as among the four top
European leaders, for egalitarianism and modernity.

'egalitarianism' is apparently meant as 'socialism' and 'modernity' as 'technocracy' (which are the buzz words of the WEF).
So 'the GREAT RESET' is actually the return of Caesar and the ancient Rome.
Well, yes, possibly.
But who wants Rome back???
Ancients Rome was a slaveholder society, where about two out of three people were slaves.
Since slave-ownership ranks among the unforgivable sins, all successions of ancient Rome will be destroyed by God himself.

All of them did essentially the same thing:
>
they have sent their armies into territories, which were not theirs and
forced the inhabitants of the occupied regions to fight in their army.
>
In case of Napoleon this was a disaster for the Prussians, which died in
large numbers in the Russian winter.
>
That stupid corsian piece of shit didn't do that, however, but left the
Prussians there to die together with the French soldiers.
>
Hitler did almost the same thing.
>
Hitlers occupation involved more serious crimes however, which were much
more devastating for the German soldiers.
>
E.g. Hitler refused to occupy Leningrad.
>
This was extremely stupid, because Leningrad has a harbor and having a
harbor there would allow the Wehrmacht to use ships (instead of walking
through the Russian winter).
>
To prevent German success, the Nazis had to surround Leningrad and
starved 1 million Russians to death, which was a very serious crime,
too.
>
But it was also extremely stupid, because with occupation of Leningrad
the Baltic Sea would have been entirely under German control.
>
That in turn would allow Navi-ships to move quite safely back and forth
and that in  turn would have saved millions of lifes.
>
>
Also the Stalingrad campaign was extremely stupid and extremely deadly.
>
It made not sense of any kind to invade that region in the first place.
>
But especially the city Stalingrad was of no particular interest and the
campaigned served no obvious purpose (despite wiping out an entire
army).
>
So: Hitler was a piece of shit, too, but for very similar reasons as
Napoleon.

 Pale versions of Genghis Khan.

Well, that shithead lived much earlier, but was actually worse than Napoleon and Hitler combined.
...
TH