Re: Glory to the Workforce! [Legalize Comedy]

Am Montag000007, 07.04.2025 um 12:03 schrieb J. J. Lodder:

Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote:
 

Am Mittwoch000026, 26.03.2025 um 08:39 schrieb J. J. Lodder:
>

It is historically incorrect, because Mussolini came earlier than Hitler
(roughly ten years).
>
And Mussolini was on the payroll of the British MI6.

>
There you go again.
Do you really need to be crazy about every aspect of history?
>

>
Here comes a quote from British mainstream media:
>
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/oct/13/benito-mussolini-recruited-mi5-i

taly

>
quote:
>
"Archived documents have revealed that Mussolini got his start in
politics in 1917 with the help of a £100 weekly wage from MI5."
>
(So, actually I made a mistake and Mussolini didn't work for MI6 but for
MI5.
>
Sorry for that...)

  Your quote mining is far worse, in the way of error.
The preceding sentence says it is about:
===
[Mussolini] ... his brief career as a British agent.
===
 What part of 'brief' don't you understand?
 And for the perhaps misled kiddies, on what it was all about:
Italy fought on the Allied side in WWI.
But the war went bady for them, and there was a lot of peace protests.
Mussolini, a mere journalist at the time, was fiercely on the allied
side, so for keeping up the war.
He ordered hisgang of blackshirts to beat up peace demonstrators.
Well worth some pocket money, while it lasted.
To the British Mussolini was a paid agitator, more than an agent,
 

The US/British had a LOOOONG history of political double agents.
(E.g. Idi Amin, Saddam Hussein, Gadhaffi ... )
Most likely Dönitz, Rommel and Hitler himself were British agents, too.
So, why not Mussolini, if the British already admitted paying and supporting him???
TH