Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?

Am Sonntag000013, 13.04.2025 um 10:07 schrieb Ross Finlayson:

On 04/13/2025 12:11 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:

Am Samstag000012, 12.04.2025 um 12:39 schrieb Bobbie Bakhvalov:

Thomas Heger wrote:
>

I'm an engineer from education and had no personal contacts to the
physics department. So: possibly they speak in a different idiom than
engineers do.
>
To me the title 'moving bodies' (combined with 'electric forces') sounds
like a synonym for 'sex'.
...

>
since you are engineer neither. Ever heard of a blackbody in your area of
interest?..

>
Actually you are right, because I'm not an engineer by profession.
>
But I own a very nice document from the university 'TU-Berlin', which
grants the academic degree 'Dipl.-Ing.' to me.
>
Therefore I'm allowed to use 'Dipl.-Ing.' on all letters that I write. I
could also write that on my door-bell (if I wanted to, what I didn't).
>
About 'blackbody radiation' I have heard before.
>
Most of the relevant equations I could write down here, without looking
them up.
>
>
Why I think, that Einstein's title is 'mocking'?
>
Well, I conducted extensive studies on that particular paper and found,
that article is really bad and FULL of errors.
>
The number of errors is sooooo large, that they cannot be explained as
mistakes, but another explanation is required.
>
This would be im my opinion an intentional offense ('mocking'), to which
the title would be the 'cherry on the cake'.
>
>
TH

 Maybe he was just suffering through a language barrier.

Well, Einstein was German and wrote in German, hence there was no 'language barrier'.

 Einstein developed a lot. Definitely there are differences early
Einstein and later Einstein. I contrast that with myself, having a very
coherent narrative since I was very versed in all the super-classical
theories then set loose on modern mathematics and premier physics.

Sure, he developed and became a much better physicist.
But I'm talking about a certain paper from 1905, when Einstein was 26.
...
TH