Re: No true relativist!

On 11/11/2024 09:54 AM, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:

Ross: It's obviously easy for you to be glib since you are basing your
discussions on false premises, such as that geometry causes gravity, as
GR claims. This is a pure reification fallacy, as stated by several
scholars cited in "Poincaré and Cosmic Space: Curved or not?"
>
Of course, since the universe is known to be vastly larger now than in
Schwarzschild's time, the curvature would be infinitesimal and
undetectable and couldn't rescue the Big Bang from placing us at the
center of the universe.
>
You know you strut your stuff like a poodle.

Well no, I have that a 3 space dimension + 1/2 time dimension (a ray)
makes for a 1-D hologram linear and that this tents up space as that
then gravity is just it falling in, that, in this sense the
"geometry causes gravity", yes, it's part of a mathematical universe
hypothesis, and a continuous one, yet what you got wrong is that
in Relativity theory is that Space-Time, the contents, makes
relations geometrically in space-time, the space, and doesn't
explain why space curves or relaxes to flat, only promises
that it does "in the limit" as it's "classical in the limit".
This way "one numbers" is quite sufficient for mathematical physics.
... That it is a fall gravity.
The GR is it "in the limit", ..., with real space-contraction.
"We only ever learned vector addition."
"Here's tensors, tensorial products sort of add up."
"What tensors are what?"
"Good question. The handout is same as vector addition."