Re: [SR] Usefulness of real velocities in accelerated relativistic frames of reference.

Den 15.03.2024 15:39, skrev Richard Hachel:

Le 15/03/2024 à 15:12, "Paul B. Andersen" a écrit :

I do indeed understand that you telling me:
  Vr(t) = a⋅t
and:
  Vm(t) = Vr(t)/2
>
And I do indeed understand that what you are telling me is wrong.
And it is a very naive and elementary blunder!
>

 No, you simply understand that what I say, on certain points, is different from what the usual SR says.

Quite.
You are telling we what Newtonian Mechanics say,
which has nothing to do with SR.

You conclude, without any serious examination, that it is therefore false.

Yes, sorry. I thought you were talking about SR, but I was wrong.
Richard Hachel's equations:
  Speed of rocket in inertial frame:             Vr=a.Tr
  Average speed of rocket in the inertial frame: Vrm=(1/2)Vr
Are correct only in Newtonian Mechanics with Galilean relativity.
So Richard Hachel's theory is identical to Newtonian Mechanics.
But why is "[SR]" in the subject line when you only
are talking about Newtonian Mechanics?
--
Paul
https://paulba.no/