Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal
De : python (at) *nospam* invalid.org (Python)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 21. Apr 2024, 22:42:20
Autres entêtes
Organisation : CCCP
Message-ID : <v0417s$gf71$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
Le 21/04/2024 à 23:31, Richard Hachel a écrit :
[snip babbling]
1. You must only use one reference frame during the entire trip.
"use" a reference frame... sigh...

2. the accelerated twin must go into “native” state, i.e. at rest.
At rest with respect to what? Absolute space again! You are
insufferable.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
13 Apr 24 * [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal36Richard Hachel
13 Apr 24 +* Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal6Python
13 Apr 24 i`* Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal5Maciej Wozniak
13 Apr 24 i `* Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal4Python
13 Apr 24 i  `* Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal3Maciej Wozniak
13 Apr 24 i   `* Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal2Python
14 Apr 24 i    `- Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal1Python
13 Apr 24 +- Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal1Osman Agelakos
13 Apr 24 +* Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal5gharnagel
13 Apr 24 i+* Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal3Maciej Wozniak
13 Apr 24 ii`* Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal2gharnagel
14 Apr 24 ii `- Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal1Cherles Hoffmann
14 Apr 24 i`- Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal1Leolin Vilinbahov
20 Apr 24 `* Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal23Tom Roberts
20 Apr 24  +* Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal9Python
21 Apr 24  i`* Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal8Richard Hachel
21 Apr 24  i +* Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal5Python
21 Apr 24  i i`* Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal4Richard Hachel
21 Apr 24  i i `* Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal3Python
22 Apr 24  i i  `* Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal2Richard Hachel
22 Apr 24  i i   `- Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal1Python
21 Apr 24  i `* Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal2Python
21 Apr 24  i  `- Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal1Richard Hachel
20 Apr 24  +- Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal1Maciej Wozniak
20 Apr 24  +- Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal1German Dorotea
21 Apr 24  +* Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal3Richard Hachel
21 Apr 24  i`* Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal2Athel Cornish-Bowden
21 Apr 24  i `- Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal1Zhunda Mochalov
21 Apr 24  `* Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal8Ross Finlayson
21 Apr 24   +* Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal6Python
21 Apr 24   i+- Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal1Kory Kato
21 Apr 24   i`* Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal4Richard Hachel
21 Apr 24   i `* Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal3Python
21 Apr 24   i  `* Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal2Richard Hachel
21 Apr 24   i   `- Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal1Python
21 Apr 24   `- Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal1Tai Loong

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal